DRJ
11-06-2003, 08:26 AM
I have a Pinnacle PCTV card that worked correctly when running from the CD and after a debian type installation, but before configuring my ethernet interface. Now I get static on each channel even when I configure xawtv correctly. Here are the relevent messages from dmesg:
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
i2c-core.o: i2c core module
i2c-algo-bit.o: i2c bit algorithm module
bttv: driver version 0.7.107 loaded
bttv: using 4 buffers with 2080k (8320k total) for capture
bttv: Host bridge is VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo
KT266/A/333]
bttv: Bt8xx card found (0).
bttv0: Bt878 (rev 17) at 00:0c.0, irq: 11, latency: 32, mmio: 0
xe9002000
bttv0: detected: Pinnacle PCTV [card=39], PCI subsystem ID is 1
1bd:0012
bttv0: using: BT878(Pinnacle PCTV Studio/Ra) [card=39,autodetec
ted]
i2c-core.o: adapter bt848 #0 registered as adapter 0.
bttv0: i2c: checking for MSP34xx @ 0x80... not found
bttv0: pinnacle/mt: id=5 info="NTSC / mono" radio=no
bttv0: using tuner=33
bttv0: i2c: checking for MSP34xx @ 0x80... not found
bttv0: i2c: checking for TDA9875 @ 0xb0... not found
bttv0: i2c: checking for TDA7432 @ 0x8a... not found
tvaudio: TV audio decoder + audio/video mux driver
tvaudio: known chips: tda9840,tda9873h,tda9874h/a,tda9850,tda98
55,tea6300,tea6420,tda8425,pic16c54 (PV951),ta8874z
i2c-core.o: driver generic i2c audio driver registered.
i2c-core.o: driver i2c tda9887 driver registered.
tda9887: chip found @ 0x86
i2c-core.o: client [tda9887] registered to adapter [bt848 #0](p
os. 0).
i2c-core.o: driver i2c TV tuner driver registered.
tuner: chip found @ 0xc0
tuner: type set to 33 (MT2032 universal)
MT2032: Companycode=4d54 Part=04 Revision=04
i2c-core.o: client [MT2032 universal] registered to adapter [bt
848 #0](pos. 1).
MT2032: Companycode=4d54 Part=04 Revision=04
bttv0: PLL: 28636363 => 35468950 .. ok
bttv0: registered device video0
bttv0: registered device vbi0
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
MT2032 Fatal Error: PLLs didn't lock.
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
MT2032 Fatal Error: PLLs didn't lock.
bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
Can anyone tell me if the problem lies here? If so, how can I correct it? Thanks!
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
i2c-core.o: i2c core module
i2c-algo-bit.o: i2c bit algorithm module
bttv: driver version 0.7.107 loaded
bttv: using 4 buffers with 2080k (8320k total) for capture
bttv: Host bridge is VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo
KT266/A/333]
bttv: Bt8xx card found (0).
bttv0: Bt878 (rev 17) at 00:0c.0, irq: 11, latency: 32, mmio: 0
xe9002000
bttv0: detected: Pinnacle PCTV [card=39], PCI subsystem ID is 1
1bd:0012
bttv0: using: BT878(Pinnacle PCTV Studio/Ra) [card=39,autodetec
ted]
i2c-core.o: adapter bt848 #0 registered as adapter 0.
bttv0: i2c: checking for MSP34xx @ 0x80... not found
bttv0: pinnacle/mt: id=5 info="NTSC / mono" radio=no
bttv0: using tuner=33
bttv0: i2c: checking for MSP34xx @ 0x80... not found
bttv0: i2c: checking for TDA9875 @ 0xb0... not found
bttv0: i2c: checking for TDA7432 @ 0x8a... not found
tvaudio: TV audio decoder + audio/video mux driver
tvaudio: known chips: tda9840,tda9873h,tda9874h/a,tda9850,tda98
55,tea6300,tea6420,tda8425,pic16c54 (PV951),ta8874z
i2c-core.o: driver generic i2c audio driver registered.
i2c-core.o: driver i2c tda9887 driver registered.
tda9887: chip found @ 0x86
i2c-core.o: client [tda9887] registered to adapter [bt848 #0](p
os. 0).
i2c-core.o: driver i2c TV tuner driver registered.
tuner: chip found @ 0xc0
tuner: type set to 33 (MT2032 universal)
MT2032: Companycode=4d54 Part=04 Revision=04
i2c-core.o: client [MT2032 universal] registered to adapter [bt
848 #0](pos. 1).
MT2032: Companycode=4d54 Part=04 Revision=04
bttv0: PLL: 28636363 => 35468950 .. ok
bttv0: registered device video0
bttv0: registered device vbi0
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
MT2032 Fatal Error: PLLs didn't lock.
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
mt2032: re-init PLLs by LINT
MT2032 Fatal Error: PLLs didn't lock.
bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
Can anyone tell me if the problem lies here? If so, how can I correct it? Thanks!