Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Suggestion and mockup: Klik installer

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3

    Suggestion and mockup: Klik installer

    Hello,

    I've made a small Klik installer mockup that can be found here http://www.geocities.com/reflash8435...uggestion.html

    Please let me know what do you think.

    SnOp

  2. #2
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,159
    Hi SnOp,

    thanks for your creative ideas. As you might know, klik doesn't "install" anything. It just produces cmg files that do not need to be installed and can be placed in any location you want.

    klik is designed to have no need to be configured/ask questions. It should work by just clicking "OK" - that's all the user should be asked. Hence, klik should have as little interface as neccessary.

    Advanced users are free to move cmg files to other locations, e.g. /opt.

    Please also keep in mind that klik must run on KDE, GNOME, and pure shell - using the respective native user interface.

    So in summary, I don't think a GUI like the one you suggested will be neccessary and possible anytime soon.

    Greetings,
    probono

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3
    thanks for your creative ideas. As you might know, klik doesn't "install" anything. It just produces cmg files that do not need to be installed and can be placed in any location you want.
    Well it does, in fact, install an application even if it's "just" a cmg file. You may think on this kind of gui as a .klikrc configurator more than an installer. Most users will want to choose where to install the files and keep this settings for future usage. Introducing a .klikrc file is needed, from my point of view, but it's not useful if that's not easly dicoverable/editable (specially for not so advanced users).

    klik is designed to have no need to be configured/ask questions. It should work by just clicking "OK" - that's all the user should be asked. Hence, klik should have as little interface as neccessary.
    Installation would be "one klik away". Instead of pressing the first "OK" in the current dialog people would press "Install". The difference would be that when pressing "Install" people would know where the application will be installed and wheter or not it would be executed. It's too intrusive IMHO to execute an application without asking the user at least.

    Please also keep in mind that klik must run on KDE, GNOME, and pure shell - using the respective native user interface.
    That's right. In fact this dialog just will show in case of a user running KDE. For Gnome/Xfce users a GTK+ version could be made. But, anyway, the current scripts (.klik and so on) should be used in case the installer can't be found.

    So in summary, I don't think a GUI like the one you suggested will be neccessary and possible anytime soon.
    I must agree with you. Perhaps is too soon to introduce a gui like this for klik. But it would be great for distributions who aim for a more polished desktop experience.

    Keep up with the good work.

    SnOp

Similar Threads

  1. phpbb suggestion
    By hunkychop in forum Ideas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2007, 05:35 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 09:45 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-06-2006, 05:19 PM
  4. suggestion: dmidecode, mtx
    By apb25 in forum Ideas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2005, 09:30 PM
  5. Replies: 210
    Last Post: 12-04-2004, 03:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Dell PowerEdge R620 Server, 2x E5-2680 2.6Ghz, 16Cores, 32GB, RPS, 2TB -4x 500GB picture

Dell PowerEdge R620 Server, 2x E5-2680 2.6Ghz, 16Cores, 32GB, RPS, 2TB -4x 500GB

$387.20



Dell PowerEdge R310 1U Server - X3470 @ 2.93GHz | 24GB | 4x 3.5

Dell PowerEdge R310 1U Server - X3470 @ 2.93GHz | 24GB | 4x 3.5" SAS/SATA Bays

$99.99



Dell PowerEdge R720 Server, 2x E5-2680 2.7GHz, 16 Cores, 96GB, RPS, 2x 1.2TB SAS picture

Dell PowerEdge R720 Server, 2x E5-2680 2.7GHz, 16 Cores, 96GB, RPS, 2x 1.2TB SAS

$652.80



Dell PowerEdge R720 Server Xeon E5-2670 2.60GHz (x2) 64GB RAM No HDDs H710 Mini picture

Dell PowerEdge R720 Server Xeon E5-2670 2.60GHz (x2) 64GB RAM No HDDs H710 Mini

$299.99



Dell PowerEdge R230 Server w/ Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5, 16GB DDR4 & 2x500GB HDD picture

Dell PowerEdge R230 Server w/ Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5, 16GB DDR4 & 2x500GB HDD

$320.00



Dell PowerEdge R720xd 24bay,2 heatsinks, no proc, no ram, perc h710,1x1100w psu picture

Dell PowerEdge R720xd 24bay,2 heatsinks, no proc, no ram, perc h710,1x1100w psu

$175.00



Dell R710 Dual E5530, 8GB RAM  picture

Dell R710 Dual E5530, 8GB RAM

$120.00



Dell Poweredge R220 1U Server Xeon E3-1271 V3 3.6Ghz / 32GB / 1TB SATA picture

Dell Poweredge R220 1U Server Xeon E3-1271 V3 3.6Ghz / 32GB / 1TB SATA

$299.99



Dell PowerEdge R720 2.5

Dell PowerEdge R720 2.5" Server, 2x 2.6GHz 8Core E5-2650V2, 32GB 4x Trays H710

$259.99



Dell Poweredge R220 1U Server Xeon E3-1240 V3 3.4Ghz / 16GB / 1TB SATA picture

Dell Poweredge R220 1U Server Xeon E3-1240 V3 3.4Ghz / 16GB / 1TB SATA

$209.99