-
Senior Member
registered user
Mint 10 LXDE USB
Some thoughts on Mint 10 LXDE for USB
I thought I'd compare Mint 10 LXDE for USB with my Knoppix 6.4.4
'install' on a 2 Gb SanDisk and my Dell 1545 laptop.
Both of these have snappy LXDE/PCManFM desktops. I've become a
little critical of Knoppix 6.4.4's fragile X, so I am looking to
see just where that problem resides.
I used a Windows Pendrive installer to create a USB directly from
a downloaded Mint 10 LXDE CD iso. No intermediate CD required.
This works fine, providing persistent store as well. Gives an almost
identical initial footprint; however, OpenOffice isn't included.
Adding OOo and a few other tweaks, I find there's about 300 Mb
less space to begin with. Probably best to use at least 4 Gb
if you have it.
As most distributions are, Mint 10 is initially hostile to Broadcom
wireless. I get around this by temporarily using an external wifi
adapter that has the right political correctness, firing up synaptic
and installing three bcmwl programs. Rebooting on the internal wifi
then works just fine.
Mint 10 is also initially hostile to using a nano/mouse rather than
the built-in touchpad. No way to simply disable the touchpad.
Adding a one-liner /etc/X11/Xsession.d/15x11-synaptics solves this
same as in Knoppix 6.4.4.
My initial housekeeping includes uninstalling Ubiquity, and
disabling mint-fortune. Have begun my usual warfare with ntp in
order to retain my own idea of desktop local time; usually works
well until first automatic time correction.
So far, no hiccups in X, but it's not been in use long. Stay tuned.
ps. No Compiz, none at all.
-
Senior Member
registered user
Additional notes:
Pendrive Windows program:
http://www.pendrivelinux.com/univers...easy-as-1-2-3/
Mint 10 LXDE kernel (uname -a):
Linux mint 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:36:48 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
Mint 10 LXDE promo:
http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=1705
Mint Forums:
http://forums.linuxmint.com/
Last edited by utu; 03-18-2011 at 07:18 PM.
-
Senior Member
registered user
Correction:
Compiz is not installed by default;
it is available via synaptic.
Not a recommendation, just an observation.
-
Senior Member
registered user
Additional notes:
Known Meerkat issues (Mint 10 based on Meerkat):
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeer...Known%20Issues
Distrowatch package list for Mint:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mint
Distrowatch package list for Knoppix, for comparison:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=knoppix
-
I use mint on my laptop and knoppix on my usb. But I have a free 8g laying around. I'm going to give it a shot
-
Senior Member
registered user
@dinosoep
I think you may like it.
Their material suggests no less than 3 Gb, and I agree.
I think there is lot of Gnome stuff which takes a lot of space.
So far no X hiccups.
Good luck on your install.
-
Senior Member
registered user
Mint 10's LXDE/PCManFM desktop seems solid enough to me. I don't
detect any 'weakness' in its handling of X-duties over several days
and several boot-ups. Never had an occasion where I needed ctl-alt-
backspace or a re-boot to recover my control over the X-territory.
There is an inconsistency though that is hard to overlook.
Mint has many nice GUI amenities; many, I suppose depend on
the Gnome infrastructure. The whole purpose of the LXDE
approach was to get away from Gnome and/or KDE infrastructures'
demand on computer resources.
In comparing Knoppix 6.4 USB with Mint 10 LXDE USB, therefore
we find that 2 Gb will suffice for Knoppix, but 3 Gb is required
for Mint. Of course you can't buy 3 Gb, you have to buy 4.
Considering the array of amenities, an 8 Gb install might even
be preferable to sample all the offerings. But then why would you
need a lightweight desktop in this situation. Takes all kinds, I guess.
This experiment has exploded my prejudice that LXDE/PCManFM is
inherently disposed to a weakness, which I've nick-named 'Fragile-X'.
In my 2 Gb Knoppix 6.4.4 USB I occasionally have a hang-up in X which
requires ctl-alt-backspace to recover. Occasions that require a
full re-boot are quite rare, but they do occur.
I now expect this 'weakness' may be unique to my own usage pattern or
installation history, rather than unique to the basic design. I do know
I'm not the only one having similar occasional problems, but that doesn't
explain what's going on. 'Fragile-X' is a fact in my install, but just
what does explain the phenom is unknown at present.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
DELL PowerEdge R730XD Server 2x E5-2690v4 2.6GHz =28 Cores 64GB H730 4xRJ45
$387.00
Dell PowerEdge T420 2x Xeon E5-2430 V2 2.50GHZ 32GB DDR3-1600MHZ 2x 550W PSU
$149.95
1U Supermicro Server 10 Bay 2x Intel Xeon 3.3Ghz 8C 128GB RAM 480GB SSD 2x 10GBE
$273.00
DELL PowerEdge R730 Server 2x E5-2697v4 2.3GHz =36 Cores 128GB H730 4xRJ45
$461.00
Dell PowerEdge R630 Server 2x E5-2640v3 2.60Ghz 16-Core 64GB H330
$182.65
DELL R630 SERVER 8 x 2.5'' 2X E5-2680V4 32GB RAM IDRAC ENT & NDC 2X 495W PSU
$169.95
Dell PowerEdge R730XD 28 Core Server 2X Xeon E5-2680 V4 H730 128GB RAM No HDD
$389.99
SuperMicro Server 505-2 Intel Atom 2.4GHz 8GB RAM SYS-5018A-FTN4 1U Rackmount
$202.49
Dell PowerEdge R730 2x E5-2699V3 2.3Ghz 36 Core 128GB RAM H730 X520-I350 2x750W
$299.99
Cisco UCS C220 M4 1x Xeon E5-2667 V4 3.20GHZ 128GB DDR4-2400MHZ 2x 770W AC PSU
$129.99