-
2 months and still no Knoppix 7.1 community distro... any ETA to share with us ?
-
Senior Member
registered user
Greetings, Gilles.
Klaus K is still struggling with a PCManFM problem in CeBIT 7.1.
If you have a solution for that, it would help get the Community Version out.
As I understand it, a mouse-over of a desktop icon ( in the CeBIT version)
causes an automatic click to open unless a double-click to open option is in force.
Werner or Klaus2008 may be able to explain this more clearly, I don't have
the CeBIT version, myself.
Regards.
-
Hi Utu,
I just tried Knoppix CeBIT 7.1 as a VMware guest (booting from the iso without customization)
and I can see that just moving the mouse over the "KNOPPIX" folder (without any button pressed)
does actually select that folder as if the button was pressed before moving over that desktop icon.
But it does not open the folder content (as if you would click on that desktop folder icon).
As expected a click on the folder icon does open the folder content.
Not sure why this is a big deal anyway.
In my slightly customized setup I disabled the single click and the problem is gone:
in the [config] section of the file: ~knoppix/.config/libfm/libfm.conf
change "single_click=1" to "single_click=0"
I understand that for some user the need for a double click may be a problem
but this can always be improved/solved in a later release and my guess is that
a lot of Knoppix users would be very happy to see a Knoppix 7.1 Community version
released sooner than later (even with a double click as a default) since not
everybody can have access to the Knoppix CeBIT 7.1version.
My two cents,
Gilles
-
I don't believe PCManFM's problem is the only problem within V7.1. If I look for possibly problems, I'll get this list. In comparison, within V7.0.5 are no problems reported by kn-what.sh.
Code:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err:
||/ Name Version
hi artwiz-cursor 1:1.3-2knoppix1
hi egoboo 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1
hi egoboo-data 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1
hi gnome-orca 3.4.2-2
pi kdebase-workspace 4:4.8.4-6
hi libfm-data 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-dev 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-gtk-bin 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-gtk1 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm1 1.1.0-1knoppix
pi libkutils4 4:4.8.4-4
pi libnspr4-0d:i386 2:4.9.4-2
pi libnss3-1d:i386 2:3.13.6-2
hi lxsession 0.4.6.1-4knoppix
pi module-init-tools 9-2
hi ntfs-3g 2:2012.1.15AR.8-2knoppix0
hi pcmanfm 1.1.0-1knoppix
pi python-aptdaemon-gtk 0.45-1
pi python-gobject 3.2.2-1
hi speech-dispatcher 0.7.1-6.2
hi testdisk 1:6.14-0knoppix1
hi wpasupplicant-gnutls 1.0-4knoppix2
hi xfonts-artwiz 1:1.3-2knoppix1
-
Senior Member
registered user
Originally Posted by
Werner P. Schulz
I don't believe PCManFM's problem is the only problem within V7.1. If I look for possibly problems, I'll get this list. In comparison, within V7.0.5 are no problems reported by kn-what.sh....
This list contains many packages in common with 7.0.5, which does not have this problem.
Also, 'pi' and 'hi' mean what?
-
Some packages have the same version, some are newer.
hi => Hold/Inst
pi => Purge/Inst
Code:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err:
||/ Name Version
Knoppix V7.1 Knoppix V7.0.5
hi artwiz-cursor 1:1.3-2knoppix1 | artwiz-cursor 1:1.3-2knoppix1
hi egoboo 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1 | egoboo 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1
hi egoboo-data 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1 | egoboo-data 1:2.8.1-2knoppix1
hi gnome-orca 3.4.2-2 > gnome-orca 2.30.2-2
pi kdebase-workspace 4:4.8.4-6 > kde-workspace 4:4.7.4-2
hi libfm-data 1.1.0-1knoppix | libfm-data 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-dev 1.1.0-1knoppix | libfm-dev 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-gtk-bin 1.1.0-1knoppix | libfm-gtk-bin 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm-gtk1 1.1.0-1knoppix | libfm-gtk1 1.1.0-1knoppix
hi libfm1 1.1.0-1knoppix | libfm1 1.1.0-1knoppix
pi libkutils4 4:4.8.4-4 > libkutils4 4:4.8.4-3
pi libnspr4-0d:i386 2:4.9.4-2 > libnspr4-0d 2:4.9.3-1
pi libnss3-1d:i386 2:3.13.6-2 > libnss3-1d 2:3.13.5-1
hi lxsession 0.4.6.1-4knoppix | lxsession 0.4.6.1-4knoppix
pi module-init-tools 9-2 > module-init-tools 8-2
hi ntfs-3g 2:2012.1.15AR.8-2knoppix0 > ntfs-3g 1:2012.1.15AR.5-2knoppix
hi pcmanfm 1.1.0-1knoppix | pcmanfm 1.1.0-1knoppix
pi python-aptdaemon-gtk 0.45-1 | python-aptdaemon-gtk 0.45-1
pi python-gobject 3.2.2-1 | python-gobject 3.2.2-1
hi speech-dispatcher 0.7.1-6.2 > speech-dispatcher 0.7.1-6.1
hi testdisk 1:6.14-0knoppix1 | testdisk 1:6.14-0knoppix1
hi wpasupplicant-gnutls 1.0-4knoppix2 | wpasupplicant-gnutls 1.0-4knoppix2
hi xfonts-artwiz 1:1.3-2knoppix1 | xfonts-artwiz 1:1.3-2knoppix1
-
If I run aptitude for the first time within Knoppix V7.1, I'll get this screen; in comparison there are no error messages from aptitude within V7.0.5
aptitude_71..png
-
Senior Member
registered user
Greetings, Werner.
What happens if you try to upgrade the 17 broken packages from
"unstable" manually using
sudo apt-get install -t unstable packagename?
-
In the next days Debian testing will become stable and all within '/etc/apt/sources.lst' must be changed. Therefore at present it makes little sense to look what happens using "-t testing" versus "-t unstable". I believe, KK is also waiting until Debian Wheezy will be "stable".
-
Senior Member
registered user
Originally Posted by
Werner P. Schulz
I believe, KK is also waiting until Debian Wheezy will be "stable".
I think you are right, and this may change Aptitude's assessment.
Broken packages is not a popular theory with _some_ developers.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
IBM S822LC 8335-GCA Power 8 2U Server 2xPower8 TESTED
$695.00
IBM System X3650 M4 Server 2x Xeon 32 GB RAM NO HDD NO OS
$215.00
IBM 8203-E4A pSeries 520 6-Bay Server System Power6 2 Core 4.2GHz 4GB No HD
$240.00
IBM 520 8203-E4A Power Systems Server PowerPC Dual-Core 4.2GHZ 16GB SEE NOTES
$240.00
IBM System x3650 M3 7945AC1 Server INTEL XEON E5620 2.4GHz 4GB
$59.00
IBM X3200 M3 Tower Server Intel Xeon X3450 2.67GHz 2GB 2*500 Gb Hdd Linux AS IS
$60.00
IBM SYSTEM X3550 M4 7914AC1 Server INTEL XEON E5-2609 0 2.4GHz 8GB
$78.78
Lenovo x3550 M5 Server - 180Gb SSD/3x300Gb SAS, 64GB Ram, 2x 8c CPUs, Proxmox
$240.00
IBM x3650 M3, 7945-AC1, 40GB, XEON e5507, 2.26ghz x2 with RAID Card, No HDD
$149.40
IBM QRadar xx29 M4 2x Xeon E5-2670 2.6GHz 16-Cores | 64gb | M5120 RAID
$299.99