-
Senior Member
registered user
MX-14.3 LiveUSB Characteristics vs Others
.
After using MX-14.3 for a little while, I'm quite impressed with it.
The following is an attempt to compare it with Knoppix and other LiveUSBs.
I'd be pleased to get other folks perspective on any of this.
Code:
MX-14.3 LiveUSB Characteristics vs Other liveUSB Configurations & Comments
Major & Moderate differences:
persistence on fat32 partition vs reiserfs filesize limited to ~4 Gb.
menu-driven persistence modes vs cheatcodes built-in more desirable.
built-in re-mastering mode vs none built-in more desirable; rollback is essential.
cd-size iso vs dvd-size cd-size is better to build on;
developer(s) often on forums vs not frequent contact can be helpful.
wl driver for Broadcom wifi vs b43 more difficult wifi install if wl is chosen default.
32-bit pae kernel vs 64-bit 64-bit may be essential to uefi.
no uefi boot support vs uefi having both uefi & legacy support may be more desirable;
depends on competence of uefi firmware.
no systemd vs systemd no systemd may be more desirable;
fewer regressive surprises likely w/o systemd.
squashfs for persistence vs cloop rolling release may be impossible with cloop
hard-drive install option vs 0wn rolling release fundamentally enables version upgradability.
rolling-release distro vs not rolling-release is more desirable.
single partition configuration vs not ... good & bad ...
Small differences & identicalities:
xfce graphical cpu monitor vs lxde's lxde much superior.
use made of .bashrc vs not this is a useful feature.
xfce vs lxde xfce frame controls don't crash like lxde's.
analog desktop clock vs digital analog clock may be too small to read.
whisker menu vs ???? whisker menu easier to search for apps.
install usb from iso vs same equivalent options, roughly so.
mkliveusb option(s) vs same equivalent options, roughly so.
thunar vs pcmanfm equivalent file managers.
synaptic, geany, gparted vs same identical applications.
iceweasel, NetworkManager vs same identical applications.
leafpad, ttf-mscorefonts vs same identical applications.
libreoffice & many others vs same identical applications.
Last edited by utu; 12-30-2014 at 02:08 AM.
-
Thank you for this comparison!
You mention the "hard-drive install option ". For many people in the MX & MEPIS forum the HD install is the standard and the use of antiX/MX as a Live system on CD or USB is the option. The other way to remaster is to create a snapshot of your HD installation and to build a new USB stick by "live usb".
For me the big advantage of antiX/MX is, it's a "rolling-release distro" and you have not the different version problem as with Knoppix.
"single partition configuration" - you can always use additional partitions: edit the '/etc/fstab' and use a sysmlink to this partition.
"analog desktop clock" - change the setting from analog to digital or use DateTime clock in the panel (and the panel for example at the top instead of at the left side).
Greetings Werner
-
Senior Member
registered user
.
Thank you for your comments, Werner.
The rolling release is a big improvement. However, I just found out
from anti himself that I cant upgrade the kernel with a liveUSB.
I'd be just as happy with a small non-persistence /home partition,
maybe not even squashed.
You can scale the analog clock simply by widening the Xfce panel width
just a little, so that's not really a problem.
My remaining hangup with MX is: I only have a hazy feeling for the configuration.
Somehow, I've remastered half a dozen times and it's still intact and working.
I don't know why the antis don't just copy Klaus' uefi scheme which allows
an either/or approach to legacy/uefi.
I have decoded the MX initrd.gz and put its init in geany for browsing.
Nice looking code by BitJam, about 4000 lines of bash. Still could use a
roadmap.
MX also has an aufs dependence like Knoppix which may be in danger if
aufs gets thrown out of the kernel.
Last edited by utu; 01-03-2015 at 07:22 PM.
-
Senior Member
registered user
an addendum to my previous
Originally Posted by
Werner P. Schulz
You mention the "hard-drive install option ". For many people in the MX & MEPIS forum the HD install is the standard and the use of antiX/MX as a Live system on CD or USB is the option. The other way to remaster is to create a snapshot of your HD installation and to build a new USB stick by "live usb".
I had in mind some comparison with Knoppix's 0wn 'HD install' which always required some caveats.
It is clear the MX 'live' approach is an extension of the poor-man's (HD) install as a means of making a LiveUSB.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
CSE-118 Supermicro 1U 3x GPU Server 2.6Ghz 20-C 128GB CX353A 2x1600W PSU Rails
$454.03
CSE-118 Supermicro 1U GPU Server 2.6Ghz 28-C 128GB 2x Nvidia K40 GPU 2x1600W PSU
$580.03
Dell Poweredge R640 Server | 2x Silver 4114 20 Cores | 96GB | 8x 1.8TB Dell SAS
$2749.99
Dell PowerEdge R630 8SFF 2.6Ghz 20-Core 128GB Mem 2x10G+2x1G NIC 2x750W PSU
$399.04
Intel Xeon Gold 6140 SR3AX 2.3GHz 18-Core Processor CPU
$44.99
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 2.7GHz 30M 12-Core LGA2011 CPU Processor SR19H
$27.99
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 2.4GHz 35MB 14-Core 120W LGA2011-3 SR2N7
$17.99
Intel Xeon e5-2698v3 2.30Ghz 16 Core 32 Thread CPU SR1XE
$20.99
Dell Precision T5600/t5610 Xeon E5-2670 2.6Ghz 16GB DDR3 RAM NO HDD Nvidia
$85.50
Lenovo Thinkstation P720 Gaming Edition (Intel Xeon Gold 6128,96GB RAM,RTX 2080)
$491.77