-
Senior Member
registered user
MX-14.3 LiveUSB Characteristics vs Others
.
After using MX-14.3 for a little while, I'm quite impressed with it.
The following is an attempt to compare it with Knoppix and other LiveUSBs.
I'd be pleased to get other folks perspective on any of this.
Code:
MX-14.3 LiveUSB Characteristics vs Other liveUSB Configurations & Comments
Major & Moderate differences:
persistence on fat32 partition vs reiserfs filesize limited to ~4 Gb.
menu-driven persistence modes vs cheatcodes built-in more desirable.
built-in re-mastering mode vs none built-in more desirable; rollback is essential.
cd-size iso vs dvd-size cd-size is better to build on;
developer(s) often on forums vs not frequent contact can be helpful.
wl driver for Broadcom wifi vs b43 more difficult wifi install if wl is chosen default.
32-bit pae kernel vs 64-bit 64-bit may be essential to uefi.
no uefi boot support vs uefi having both uefi & legacy support may be more desirable;
depends on competence of uefi firmware.
no systemd vs systemd no systemd may be more desirable;
fewer regressive surprises likely w/o systemd.
squashfs for persistence vs cloop rolling release may be impossible with cloop
hard-drive install option vs 0wn rolling release fundamentally enables version upgradability.
rolling-release distro vs not rolling-release is more desirable.
single partition configuration vs not ... good & bad ...
Small differences & identicalities:
xfce graphical cpu monitor vs lxde's lxde much superior.
use made of .bashrc vs not this is a useful feature.
xfce vs lxde xfce frame controls don't crash like lxde's.
analog desktop clock vs digital analog clock may be too small to read.
whisker menu vs ???? whisker menu easier to search for apps.
install usb from iso vs same equivalent options, roughly so.
mkliveusb option(s) vs same equivalent options, roughly so.
thunar vs pcmanfm equivalent file managers.
synaptic, geany, gparted vs same identical applications.
iceweasel, NetworkManager vs same identical applications.
leafpad, ttf-mscorefonts vs same identical applications.
libreoffice & many others vs same identical applications.
Last edited by utu; 12-30-2014 at 02:08 AM.
-
Thank you for this comparison!
You mention the "hard-drive install option ". For many people in the MX & MEPIS forum the HD install is the standard and the use of antiX/MX as a Live system on CD or USB is the option. The other way to remaster is to create a snapshot of your HD installation and to build a new USB stick by "live usb".
For me the big advantage of antiX/MX is, it's a "rolling-release distro" and you have not the different version problem as with Knoppix.
"single partition configuration" - you can always use additional partitions: edit the '/etc/fstab' and use a sysmlink to this partition.
"analog desktop clock" - change the setting from analog to digital or use DateTime clock in the panel (and the panel for example at the top instead of at the left side).
Greetings Werner
-
Senior Member
registered user
.
Thank you for your comments, Werner.
The rolling release is a big improvement. However, I just found out
from anti himself that I cant upgrade the kernel with a liveUSB.
I'd be just as happy with a small non-persistence /home partition,
maybe not even squashed.
You can scale the analog clock simply by widening the Xfce panel width
just a little, so that's not really a problem.
My remaining hangup with MX is: I only have a hazy feeling for the configuration.
Somehow, I've remastered half a dozen times and it's still intact and working.
I don't know why the antis don't just copy Klaus' uefi scheme which allows
an either/or approach to legacy/uefi.
I have decoded the MX initrd.gz and put its init in geany for browsing.
Nice looking code by BitJam, about 4000 lines of bash. Still could use a
roadmap.
MX also has an aufs dependence like Knoppix which may be in danger if
aufs gets thrown out of the kernel.
Last edited by utu; 01-03-2015 at 07:22 PM.
-
Senior Member
registered user
an addendum to my previous
Originally Posted by
Werner P. Schulz
You mention the "hard-drive install option ". For many people in the MX & MEPIS forum the HD install is the standard and the use of antiX/MX as a Live system on CD or USB is the option. The other way to remaster is to create a snapshot of your HD installation and to build a new USB stick by "live usb".
I had in mind some comparison with Knoppix's 0wn 'HD install' which always required some caveats.
It is clear the MX 'live' approach is an extension of the poor-man's (HD) install as a means of making a LiveUSB.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
SQL Server 2019 Standard (10 CAL) - Windows and Linux, Physical License NEW
$178.45
Supermicro 2U 12-bay X8DT6 2x Xeon E5640, 250GB Boot HDD, 128GB RAM, Dual PS
$295.00
1U BareMetal pfsense opnsense Router Firewall DNS Server 6x 10GB Ethernet Ports
$169.00
IBM E850 Power8 2x 12C 3.02GHz 512Gb 1.8Tb SAS 10GbE 16Gb Linux Server 8408-E8E
$699.95
IBM X3200 M3 Tower Server Intel Xeon X3450 2.67GHz 2GB 2*500 Gb Hdd Linux AS IS
$60.00
NEW Redhat Enterprise Linux 7 Server Edition (Factory Sealed)
$25.00
Ubuntu Server 20.04 for Raspberry Pi micro SD Card Compatible with 3, 4 & 400
$14.95
Custom Laptop, Desktop or Server Badge - Set of 12 (Select your Linux distro)
$5.45
Microsoft SQL Server 2019 Standard (10 CAL) Windows, Linux Physical License, NEW
$178.99
Dell Poweredge T340 Xeon E-2124@3.3GHZ 16GB DDR4 18TB Storage NO OS 32010XD
$600.00