Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Problems to update Knoppix

  1. #1
    Junior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oulu, Finland
    Posts
    11

    Question Problems to update Knoppix

    Typing apt-get update in terminal:
    Code:
    ........
    W: The repository 'http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org ./ Release' is not signed.
    N: Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use.
    N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
    knoppix@Microknoppix:~$
    and with apt-get upgrade:
    Code:
    Preparing to unpack .../init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb ...
    Unpacking init-system-helpers (1.29) over (1.24) ...
    dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb (--unpack):
     trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/update-rc.d.8.gz', which is also in package sysv-rc 2:2.88dsf-53.2knoppix0
    Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.22-5) ...
    Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
    Errors were encountered while processing:
     /var/cache/apt/archives/init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb
    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
    knoppix@Microknoppix:~$



  2. #2
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631
    Code:
    ........
    W: The repository 'http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org ./ Release' is not signed.
    N: Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use.
    ...
    This worries me as well.

  3. #3
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124
    Which Knoppix version are you using? Still V7.2.0? If so, this version is from summer 2013 and outdated. The current release is V7.6.1 (Jan 2016).

    And by the way - never try "apt-get upgrade" within a Knoppix installation.
    Last edited by Werner P. Schulz; 04-02-2016 at 06:27 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz View Post
    Which Knoppix version are you using?
    My LiveUSB is made from a Knopppix 7.6.1 iso with a release date of 2016-01-16.
    I get the W line when I call up Synaptic and merely do a 'reload'.

    I concur on never doing the upgrade, but the warning about signing seemed unusual
    enough to question. Might this be an oversight on KK's part?

    FWIW, I did a libc6 update per KK's suggestion.
    Last edited by utu; 04-02-2016 at 03:33 PM.

  5. #5
    Junior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oulu, Finland
    Posts
    11
    My usb-knoppix is Knopppix 7.6.1 with a release date of 2016-01-16

    Quote Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz View Post
    - never try "apt-get upgrade" within a Knoppix installation.
    What's wrong with apt-get and Knoppix? I am new with the recent Knoppix, please let me know

  6. #6
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124

  7. #7
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124
    .. but the warning about signing seemed unusual enough to question.
    http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org/ isn't part of the Debian releases and maintainer of most of the packages within the archive there is "Klaus Knopper <knoppix@knopper.net".

    You can provide archive signatures in an archive under your maintenance, but it isn't stipulated. Prof. Knopper signs the whole ISOs with his key, not his archive. If in doubt you can download a package of his archive, build his checksum and compare this with the checksum listed in
    http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org/Sources.gz

  8. #8
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631

    a clarification, I hope

    .
    I'm looking for an expert opinion as to whether I should or should not concern myself
    with the Synaptic warning about specifically referenced Alioth material 'not being signed'.

    I suspect that one answer might be that this particular warning may just be disregarded,
    for technical an/or substantial reasons beyond my knowledge & experience,
    but I don't know that this is necessarily so.

  9. #9
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    802

    What is wrong: IMHO, nothing

    Quote Originally Posted by fossiili View Post
    What's wrong with apt-get and Knoppix? I am new with the recent Knoppix, please let me know
    IMHO, nothing is wrong with Knoppix and apt-get. As to doing apt-get upgrade, that should IMHO be considered potentially dangerous in most Debian configurations. It may go well, but quite often, it doesn't. There are many reasons why. One of the most important is that in practice, a running system will often have some packages not native to the release mixed in - like Knoppix.

    I have found one safe way to proceed, "everywhere Debian", to be
    Code:
    sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get -s upgrade
    Then I get a report of the upgradable packages. In some cases, I will consider the risk of trouble so small that I proceed with the ordinary upgrade, but most often, I will start with some selected, important packages. I'm not sure how much is won with a huge upgrade within a Knoppix release, even if it should be possible. Like now with Debian 8.3 -> 8.4. I rather do the absolutely necessary updates and wait for the next Knoppix release, and that has worked fairly well over the years.

  10. #10
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    802
    FYI, the output, right now, of sudo apt-get -s upgrade is 2487 lines long, 1092 packages to upgrade on a pristine Knoppix 7.6.1. Much of that is because unstable is among the sources.
    The corresponding list on plain Debian 8.3 has 70 packages to upgrade. Still too much for me to trust all will go well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 256GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W picture

H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 256GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W

$2512.18



Dell PowerEdge R640 Server 2x Gold 6150 2.70Ghz 36-Core 256GB 2x 960GB SSD H730P picture

Dell PowerEdge R640 Server 2x Gold 6150 2.70Ghz 36-Core 256GB 2x 960GB SSD H730P

$1737.25



H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 512GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W picture

H261-Z61 2U 24SFF AMD Server 8x EPYC 7551 256-Cores 512GB RAM 8x25G NIC 2x2200W

$2888.18



Dell PowerEdge FX2 FX2S Enclosure - 4x PowerEdge FC640 w/ 8x Gold 6132 112C 1TB picture

Dell PowerEdge FX2 FX2S Enclosure - 4x PowerEdge FC640 w/ 8x Gold 6132 112C 1TB

$2294.99



Dell PowerEdge R720XD Xeon E5-2680 V2 2.8GHz 20 Cores 256GB RAM 12x4TB picture

Dell PowerEdge R720XD Xeon E5-2680 V2 2.8GHz 20 Cores 256GB RAM 12x4TB

$510.00



DELL PowerEdge R730 Server 2x E5-2690v3 2.6GHz =24 Cores 32GB H730 4xRJ45 picture

DELL PowerEdge R730 Server 2x E5-2690v3 2.6GHz =24 Cores 32GB H730 4xRJ45

$275.00



Dell PowerEdge R730XD 28 Core Server 2X Xeon E5-2680 V4 H730 128GB RAM No HDD picture

Dell PowerEdge R730XD 28 Core Server 2X Xeon E5-2680 V4 H730 128GB RAM No HDD

$389.99



Dell PowerEdge R620 Server 2x Xeon  E5-2620 @ 2.0GHz 64GB RAM NO HDDs picture

Dell PowerEdge R620 Server 2x Xeon E5-2620 @ 2.0GHz 64GB RAM NO HDDs

$108.96



Dell PowerEdge R430 3.5 1U 2x E5-2690 v3 2.6ghz 24-Cores 256gb 4x Trays 2x 550w picture

Dell PowerEdge R430 3.5 1U 2x E5-2690 v3 2.6ghz 24-Cores 256gb 4x Trays 2x 550w

$289.99



HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9 16SFF 2x E5-2680v4 2.4GHz =28 Cores 64GB P840 4xRJ45 picture

HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9 16SFF 2x E5-2680v4 2.4GHz =28 Cores 64GB P840 4xRJ45

$355.00