Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Problems to update Knoppix

  1. #1
    Junior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oulu, Finland
    Posts
    11

    Question Problems to update Knoppix

    Typing apt-get update in terminal:
    Code:
    ........
    W: The repository 'http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org ./ Release' is not signed.
    N: Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use.
    N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
    knoppix@Microknoppix:~$
    and with apt-get upgrade:
    Code:
    Preparing to unpack .../init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb ...
    Unpacking init-system-helpers (1.29) over (1.24) ...
    dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb (--unpack):
     trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/update-rc.d.8.gz', which is also in package sysv-rc 2:2.88dsf-53.2knoppix0
    Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.22-5) ...
    Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
    Errors were encountered while processing:
     /var/cache/apt/archives/init-system-helpers_1.29_all.deb
    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
    knoppix@Microknoppix:~$



  2. #2
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631
    Code:
    ........
    W: The repository 'http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org ./ Release' is not signed.
    N: Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use.
    ...
    This worries me as well.

  3. #3
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124
    Which Knoppix version are you using? Still V7.2.0? If so, this version is from summer 2013 and outdated. The current release is V7.6.1 (Jan 2016).

    And by the way - never try "apt-get upgrade" within a Knoppix installation.
    Last edited by Werner P. Schulz; 04-02-2016 at 06:27 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz View Post
    Which Knoppix version are you using?
    My LiveUSB is made from a Knopppix 7.6.1 iso with a release date of 2016-01-16.
    I get the W line when I call up Synaptic and merely do a 'reload'.

    I concur on never doing the upgrade, but the warning about signing seemed unusual
    enough to question. Might this be an oversight on KK's part?

    FWIW, I did a libc6 update per KK's suggestion.
    Last edited by utu; 04-02-2016 at 03:33 PM.

  5. #5
    Junior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Oulu, Finland
    Posts
    11
    My usb-knoppix is Knopppix 7.6.1 with a release date of 2016-01-16

    Quote Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz View Post
    - never try "apt-get upgrade" within a Knoppix installation.
    What's wrong with apt-get and Knoppix? I am new with the recent Knoppix, please let me know

  6. #6
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124

  7. #7
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Germany/ Dietzenbach
    Posts
    1,124
    .. but the warning about signing seemed unusual enough to question.
    http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org/ isn't part of the Debian releases and maintainer of most of the packages within the archive there is "Klaus Knopper <knoppix@knopper.net".

    You can provide archive signatures in an archive under your maintenance, but it isn't stipulated. Prof. Knopper signs the whole ISOs with his key, not his archive. If in doubt you can download a package of his archive, build his checksum and compare this with the checksum listed in
    http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org/Sources.gz

  8. #8
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631

    a clarification, I hope

    .
    I'm looking for an expert opinion as to whether I should or should not concern myself
    with the Synaptic warning about specifically referenced Alioth material 'not being signed'.

    I suspect that one answer might be that this particular warning may just be disregarded,
    for technical an/or substantial reasons beyond my knowledge & experience,
    but I don't know that this is necessarily so.

  9. #9
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    802

    What is wrong: IMHO, nothing

    Quote Originally Posted by fossiili View Post
    What's wrong with apt-get and Knoppix? I am new with the recent Knoppix, please let me know
    IMHO, nothing is wrong with Knoppix and apt-get. As to doing apt-get upgrade, that should IMHO be considered potentially dangerous in most Debian configurations. It may go well, but quite often, it doesn't. There are many reasons why. One of the most important is that in practice, a running system will often have some packages not native to the release mixed in - like Knoppix.

    I have found one safe way to proceed, "everywhere Debian", to be
    Code:
    sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get -s upgrade
    Then I get a report of the upgradable packages. In some cases, I will consider the risk of trouble so small that I proceed with the ordinary upgrade, but most often, I will start with some selected, important packages. I'm not sure how much is won with a huge upgrade within a Knoppix release, even if it should be possible. Like now with Debian 8.3 -> 8.4. I rather do the absolutely necessary updates and wait for the next Knoppix release, and that has worked fairly well over the years.

  10. #10
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    802
    FYI, the output, right now, of sudo apt-get -s upgrade is 2487 lines long, 1092 packages to upgrade on a pristine Knoppix 7.6.1. Much of that is because unstable is among the sources.
    The corresponding list on plain Debian 8.3 has 70 packages to upgrade. Still too much for me to trust all will go well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


IBM LSI SAS9220-8i M1015 46M0861 SAS/SATA PCI-e RAID Controller Both brackets picture

IBM LSI SAS9220-8i M1015 46M0861 SAS/SATA PCI-e RAID Controller Both brackets

$139.00



LSI 9305-16i SATA SAS 12Gbs RAID Controller PCIe 3.0 x8 IT-Mode 4* 8643 SATA picture

LSI 9305-16i SATA SAS 12Gbs RAID Controller PCIe 3.0 x8 IT-Mode 4* 8643 SATA

$229.99



Broadcom 9560-16I RAID Card  SAS/SATA/NVME 8G cache SAS3916 PCIe 4.0 SFF8654 picture

Broadcom 9560-16I RAID Card SAS/SATA/NVME 8G cache SAS3916 PCIe 4.0 SFF8654

$813.95



Broadcom 9540-8i PCIe Gen4.0 X8 SAS 3808 RAID Card picture

Broadcom 9540-8i PCIe Gen4.0 X8 SAS 3808 RAID Card

$381.19



Inspur LSI 9300-8i Raid Card 12Gbps HBA HDD Controller High Profile IT MODE picture

Inspur LSI 9300-8i Raid Card 12Gbps HBA HDD Controller High Profile IT MODE

$15.98



LSI MegaRAID 9361-8i 12Gb PCIe 8-Port SAS/SATA RAID 1Gb w/BBU/CacheVault/License picture

LSI MegaRAID 9361-8i 12Gb PCIe 8-Port SAS/SATA RAID 1Gb w/BBU/CacheVault/License

$35.96



ORICO Multi Bay RAID Hard Drive Enclosure USB 3.0/ Type-C For 2.5/3.5'' HDD SSDs picture

ORICO Multi Bay RAID Hard Drive Enclosure USB 3.0/ Type-C For 2.5/3.5'' HDD SSDs

$86.99



LSI MegaRAID 9361-8i 12Gbps PCIe 3 x8 SATA SAS 3 8 Port RAID + BBU & CacheVault picture

LSI MegaRAID 9361-8i 12Gbps PCIe 3 x8 SATA SAS 3 8 Port RAID + BBU & CacheVault

$39.00



Yottamaster 5 Bay RAID Hard Drive Enclosure USB3.1 Type C 2.5

Yottamaster 5 Bay RAID Hard Drive Enclosure USB3.1 Type C 2.5"/3.5" SATA HDD SSD

$142.49



ACASIS 2.5/3.5 inch 2 Bay SATA USB 3.0 Hard Drive Disk HDD SSD Enclosure 4 RAID picture

ACASIS 2.5/3.5 inch 2 Bay SATA USB 3.0 Hard Drive Disk HDD SSD Enclosure 4 RAID

$58.99