Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Google Chrome

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    110
    Ive also just tested the force boot of 64bit knoppix, I changed the kernel command from booting vmlinuz to vmlinuz-4-4-0-64 Now when give the arch command I get x86_64 rather than i686 Yet once again when I attempt to install Chrome I get the error processing package amd64 does not match system 1386

  2. #12
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland USA
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by superman View Post
    @itman007
    If it isn't great important to use the latest stable version of Google Chrome (51.0.2704.106 as of 23/June/2016), using old stable 32-bit version of Chrome (48.0.2564.116) may be an option. Files needed to run the old Chrome on KNOPPIX 7.4.2 are as follows,

    google-chrome-stable_48.0.2564.116-1_i386.deb
    libappindicator1_0.4.92-2_i386.deb
    libdbusmenu-glib4_0.6.2-1_i386.deb
    libdbusmenu-gtk4_0.6.2-1_i386.deb
    libindicator7_0.5.0-1_i386.deb
    This Chrome (series 48 ) is not current; also i386 is for 32-bit systems.

    The Chromium which comes with Mint17.3 usVersion 50.0.2661.102 Built on Ubuntu 14.04, running on LinuxMint 17.3 (64-bit)
    So if you can find a Chrome (series 50 or later) that might help.



  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by utu View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by superman View Post
    @itman007
    If it isn't great important to use the latest stable version of Google Chrome (51.0.2704.106 as of 23/June/2016), using old stable 32-bit version of Chrome (48.0.2564.116) may be an option....
    This Chrome (series 48 ) is not current; also i386 is for 32-bit systems.

    The Chromium which comes with Mint17.3 usVersion 50.0.2661.102 Built on Ubuntu 14.04, running on LinuxMint 17.3 (64-bit)
    So if you can find a Chrome (series 50 or later) that might help.
    I am quite aware that the Chrome 48 is outdated and the specified filename is for 32-bit system as both points have been mentioned in my original post. Besides, from my limited on-line search, it is most unlikely that Chrome (not Chromium) v50 and above for 32-bit Linux can be found on the net. It is also not doable to run Windows 32-bit Chrome via Wine and is too expensive to use the approach of virtual machine just to run this single software.

  4. #14
    Administrator Site Admin-
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,441
    "'and is too expensive to use the approach of virtual machine just to run ..."

    I'm not saying that you should run a virtual machine. But in what way is it more expensive to do so? There are free options available. And since you are already committed to running a 64 bit version of the browser, i assume that you're not talking about any need to upgrade hardware for this. Please explain the "too expensive" comment.
    ---
    Verifying of md5 checksum and burning a CD at slow speed are important.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Kuhman View Post
    "'and is too expensive to use the approach of virtual machine just to run ..."
    ...
    Please explain the "too expensive" comment.
    That comment solely refers to the ratio between the storage space of Chrome and that of Windows OS.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    110
    This is seeming more and more evident that Knoppix will not run the latest version of Google Chrome.

  7. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by itman007 View Post
    This is seeming more and more evident that Knoppix will not run the latest version of Google Chrome.
    I agree. It has become evident that the original poster needs to re assess their goals. Which is more important, using Knoppix or Chrome. Since Chrome on Knoppix doesn't appear to be a viable option it has become clear that the only viable option is to switch to a different distro that does he can run Chrome on. The more time he wastes bashing his head against the wall trying to make something that simply isn't going to happen work his time would be better spent on setting up a distro that will run Chrome.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


FORTINET FORTIGATE 40F Next GEN Firewall Security Unregistered (FG-40F)-Open Box picture

FORTINET FORTIGATE 40F Next GEN Firewall Security Unregistered (FG-40F)-Open Box

$140.79



FORTINET FortiGate60F+1YR Forticare UTP Unregistered(FG-60F-BDL-950-12)-Open Box picture

FORTINET FortiGate60F+1YR Forticare UTP Unregistered(FG-60F-BDL-950-12)-Open Box

$254.25



Fortinet FortiGate 60F | 10 Gbps Firewall Network Security EXPIRED (FG-60F)- New picture

Fortinet FortiGate 60F | 10 Gbps Firewall Network Security EXPIRED (FG-60F)- New

$251.99



Palo Alto PA-220 Next-Gen Firewall 750-000128-00A w/ Power adapter  picture

Palo Alto PA-220 Next-Gen Firewall 750-000128-00A w/ Power adapter

$68.00



Sophos XG 115 VPN Firewall Appliance Rev.3 ready for PFsence picture

Sophos XG 115 VPN Firewall Appliance Rev.3 ready for PFsence

$55.00



Netgate SG-3100 pfSense Security Gateway Firewall Appliance w/Power Adapter picture

Netgate SG-3100 pfSense Security Gateway Firewall Appliance w/Power Adapter

$150.00



Sophos XG 135 VPN Firewall Appliance - White picture

Sophos XG 135 VPN Firewall Appliance - White

$80.00



Palo Alto PA-220 Next-Gen Firewall picture

Palo Alto PA-220 Next-Gen Firewall

$57.19



Fortinet Fortiwifi 60D FG-60D Security Appliance Firewall / VPN w/ AC Adapter picture

Fortinet Fortiwifi 60D FG-60D Security Appliance Firewall / VPN w/ AC Adapter

$34.97



Cisco FPR1010-NGFW-K9 FirePOWER Security Appliance **CISCO EXCESS** picture

Cisco FPR1010-NGFW-K9 FirePOWER Security Appliance **CISCO EXCESS**

$339.00