700 meg is good so 4.5 gig is better
Some people don’t have a dvd burner or rom. I understand. A cd distribution would be perfect for those people. However, in addition to the cd version, I would like to see a big bloated 4.5 gig dvd UberKnoppix. I want to learn KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox, Blackbox, windowmaker, and any others that will fit.
I would like to try Open Office, K Office, Abiword, and even Ted
Browsers? All of them. Games? There are not nearly enough on the cd. Open GL Xscreensavers you bet. Kmail, Evolution and 12 other email programs. Tools for installing, Tools for remastering. Well you get the Idea. I got my hands on a dvd version of cebit. It was nice. A little buggy but nice. Would it work if it were 4.5 gig I don’t know. But if it did it would be a useful and fun disk!
Whatever you decide I'm sure it will be great
extra modules on usb key ?
Quote:
Forgive my asking - why not consider the high density CDs (800MB)? If the ISO is 765 or even 785 MB, it would still fit in one of these...
many old cdrom players can't run high density CDs.
About the space problem, why not include a modular compressed file with around 60 / 120 (or more ) extra megabytes for putting on an usb key ? For example there could be a 3d pack, with extra 3d applications, a game pack, a music pack (with trackers, soundrecorders, sequencers), etc.
I don't know if it's technically possible, and i don't have any usb key, but it could solve some of this space problem, and give some modularity to ppl who would like this ? Also while keeping a regular "knoppix" core for most users, those extra packs could be developped separately by fans of thoses special topics.
What to drop, what to not
I'd vote in favor of removal of Kword as well. OpenOffice, while being larger than Kword, simply handles more file types than Kword. Also, I've had more problems with Kword crashing while trying to save new work, than OpenOffice, and more problems with Kword trying to print to pdf than OpenOffice. OpenOffice is simply more stable than Kword right now. While Kword will be great as it gets more stable, it isn't really stable yet. And I'll probably prefer it over OpenOffice as it does become more stable, and as it gets better at supporting more file formats. In the meantime, Knoppix must solve a space problem, and one of the two should go. Also, Knoppix is helping to bring Windows users to Linux, and OpenOffice runs on both Windows and Linux, so it can help by getting people onto Windows/OpenOffice, and then Linux/OpenOffice while keeping at least the office suite familiar.
I was going to vote for removal of Mozilla also, like others have done, until I realized that it would also mean the removal of Mozilla's Composer. This would be a bad idea. I, and others, find Composer useful, as one of the few wysiwyg type of web page builders out there. This is also something missing for would-be converts to Linux from Windows. Knoppix doesn't have Quanta Plus which is part of KDE, so the removal of Mozilla would cause two or three different major functionalities to be removed, Mozilla browser, Mozilla composer, and Mozilla mail. While I use and very much like Kmail, Kmail doesn't appear to have support for IMAP. Mozilla Mail does. So as much as I'd like to remove Mozilla due to its very large size, it would be a mistake to remove it, considering the audience of Knoppix users.
I've seen quite a few suggestions of getting rid of the 2.4 series kernel as well. I don't know how many Knoppix live-cd users are using the live-cd to run a database server, but I'd guess it isn't many. Simply because the 2.6 kernel is next to succeed 2.4 series, does not make it the best choice for everyone. I'd guess that the 2.6 kernel, currently, is a worse choice, not better choice, for most every user of Knoppix. One should read <a href=http://www.2cpu.com/articles/98_1.html>this article</a>
http://www.2cpu.com/articles/98_1.html
before making a choice for oneself. And Linus and others have made similar remarks, and warnings, one which kernel would be faster, depending on what you are using it for. So to simply dismiss the 2.4 kernel, and suggest that it be removed, without carefully examining why, and considering knoppix's intended uses, is a mistake.
One last idea. Others have suggested dropping the cd version, and maintaining only a dvd version. And others have pointed out the mistake this would be. But I think a better idea would be to take programs like kword, and other duplicative applications, and putting them on a SECOND supplemental live CD, would be a good idea. I'd guess that a large number of Knoppix users have a cd-rom drive that came with their computer, and a cd-writer that they burn the cds with. Due to space constraints, some apps have to come out of the base cd. Put the removed apps in a second cd, and enable the second cd to run from the second cd drive, which should be the cd writer. This will enable users to be able to continue using their cd burner to burn newer knoppix disks or music/data cds by removing the supplemental cd temporarily without affecting the running of knoppix, will enable 2 more Gigabytes of applications to be included for those with the two drives, and yet will still enable knoppix to be used in single cd equipped computers as a rescue disk or to write letters/whatever with OpenOffice and use other apps as well. And the second cd will enable Quanta Plus, Firefox (or whatever the current name is), kword, and other apps to still be available.
One cd is good, a second supplemental cd that runs from the second cd burner drive (or can be run from a salvaged cd drive from an older computer which is very common), and that offers an additional 2 gig of applications to be accesible is better. The second cd can be removed to burn cds, and the work that goes into enabling a second cd to run from a second drive may also provide the guidance to others to enable a dvd to run from a (second) dvd drive, enabling many more gigs of applications to be available. And at the same time, because the base cd runs from the cd drive, it will enable the supplemental dvd to be removed for dvd burning, if the dvd drive is a dvd burner.
Just my 2 cents.