Re: floppyconfig resolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody Ochs
Robert, this workaround is great; it works on the 3.9 CD and the 4.0 DVD.
Excellent news! Thanks for trying it out and letting the rest of us know. BTW, I don't know if the solution is a good solution. That is, there may be unintended side effects of creating the mountpoint that I am unaware of. If there are, I'd like anyone who discovers such a side effect to post back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody Ochs
This floppyconfig problem has been kicked around here and elsewhere on the Net for months now, and I must confess to being one of those many talkers who had no plan of action. Some people might question the value of floppy storage at all when pendrives can hold so much more data, but 1M is usually enough for almost any Knoppix configuration, and a floppy slips nicely into a standard sized jewel box along with the disk.
Admittedly, I have an adversion to floppies, but that's just because floppies are a very unreliable medium for data storage. If you use one, use two. Despite that floppies are useful, especially on older hardware that does not have USB or FW card.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody Ochs
Also of note is the fact that your resolution was clearly and logically presented.
Thanks. But what is also worth noting is that you read them, tried them, and posted your experience back. That's called teamwork. It's what builds and binds a FLOSS community.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody Ochs
Free and Open Source Software (I like that acronym FLOSS) has not been accepted as widely as it should because poor documentation (as well as really poor and absolutely pathetic documentation) is more the rule than the exception in the GNU-LINUX-BSD cosmos, ...
Unfortunately, I agree. The docs are often writen by those who are the least interested in writing docs: coders. And coders would rather write code than write docs. Of course, IMHO, the best software needs no documentation; it just works and what it does is self-explanatory. But examples of such "self-documenting" software are rare even in the proprietary world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody Ochs
... but if you address many more problems with resolutions such as this then I won't be able to whine about documentation anymore either.
My point is that it is not just me addressing problems. It's you, me, and others, too. FLOSS is a team effort, a community. Everyone can participate to help.
How can one improve the state of FLOSS, in particular, make it more widely accepted? Here are some ideas that even the non-coder can participate in:
- use FLOSS
- let non-FLOSS users know that you use FLOSS
- for the FLOSS you use, learn the community structure and tools: web pages, forums, wiki, e-mail lists, bug trackers, etc.
- participate in discussions via forums and e-mails
- give feedback: what works, what doesn't
Those are just some of the many ways people can help out and one does not even need to understand a lick of coding.
To learn more about Free Software and how to participate in the FLOSS community:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_culture
I remember finding How-Tos about participating in the FLOSS community, but those are the only two I have been able to find so far. Will keep looking.
And remember, don't panic.
Regards,
- Robert
http://www.cwelug.org