Linux compatibility and security dangers of UEFI "BIOS" in Asus N550JV

Have just acquired an Asus N550JV, and was unpleasantly made familiar for the first time with the UEFI "BIOS". The laptop comes with a generic user "manual" that doesn't even include a spec sheet (and you have to download it from the Asus site), and is totally inadequate in its instructions for external booting. I have yet to find a real manual for either the hardware or the firmware.

I sought help from the retailer's (Staples Canada) local technicians, and was told categorically that it is IMPOSSIBLE to boot Linux on this machine, externally or internally, unless one first totally wiped the hard drive and thereby eliminated any possiblity of using any version of Windows on the machine thereafter.

Of course, a few minutes with a search engine and a few more minutes tinkering with the UEFI menu proved this to be total nonsense, and after the proper adjustments, I was able to boot the machine from a Knoppix 7.2 usbflash install. However, my reading on UEFI, particularly the Wikipedia article, together with the lack of technical support from either the retailer or the manufacturer, makes me seriously wonder whether I should return this machine for refund, a decision I'll have to make within little more than a week.

Of particular concern is the UEFI "BIOS". While one of the store salesmen was trying to figure out how to boot externally on a couple of the store demo machines, using several of my bootable media, I saw that the critical menu entry - the toggle to disable secure boot - without which it's impossible to boot from external media - was missing on an Acer laptop with UEFI.

The BIOS on my machine has already been revised twice (mine is v2.04, the latest listed online is v206), and I'm worried that these revisions might remove my external boot capability. Is it possible to revert to an earlier UEFI BIOS after upgrading, or is it a one-way trip?

Other, more subtle, obstacles to the use of Linux or older OSs are suggested as possibly being concealed in machines designed for UEFI. I'm not knowledgeable enough to assess these threats, and would welcome any comments on their seriousness?

Frankly, I don't trust Microsoft or Red Hat (which according to Wikipedia, has jumped on the UEFI bandwagon with gusto), and am not willing to give up access to other or older OSs than those two offer currently. OTOH, I have no opportunity to test or even examine top end laptops in my remote location. The one in question was one of the first three Haswell cpu machines offered in my vicinity (ie. within 120Km), and even then there was no demo machine to view, so I ordered it sight unseen on the basis of very skimpy information.

I've found only one in-depth review of it online, albeit from July and of a pre-production model, which gives it high marks, but doesn't address the compatibility issues posed by UEFI at all.

Speaking of UEFI and Knoppix 7.2 - I had a frustating time just now booting 7.2 from a usbflash install that had worked previously. My Asus laptop's pseudobios didn't show the flash card as a bootable device. I eventually discovered that a recent Win8.1 update had changed the settings in security section of the UEFI BIOS and locked both USB and all external devices. Another, yet unexplained, problem I've encountered throughout with this laptop's UEFI BIOS is a failure to see the same flash card (a microSD), when installed in a USB3.0 hub using one of the chunky microSD USB adapters. The strangest part is that it recognize and boot from the same card when inserted in a USB3.0 card reader, either directly or, as right now, via a microSD to SD adapter. When I use the chunky microSD to USB adapter and plug it directly into one of the three USB3.0 ports, it boots. It's a PIA, because the ports and the reader slots are both scarce resources, especially since my external USB3.0 drives won't run off the hub, even though both the hub and the drives each have their own AC power adapter! (any light shed on any of these problems would be most welcome). I'm waiting impatiently for v7.3 myself, because v7.2 doesn't seem to see anything in the ASUS' internal SD slot, and doesn't handle my 64GB SDXC flash card even in the card reader, making me totally dependent on Windows 8.x (the worst I've ever used since 3.0) to archive my photos.

After posting the last message, I discovered to my horror that I can no longer access any of my storage devices in any position with Knoppix 7.2. The only way I can even see my two external USB drives are there is via the GO/MYcomputer path, "media" shows nothing except a list of sdx mount points with no subfolders. The path above shows only the names of the external drives, and asks what app to use to open them. Sometimes trying to open them makes the icons disappear, sometimes it locks up Knoppix so I have to power down. Even the flash card it booted from can't be accessed. It shows as sdg2, and when I clcik on it it disappears. So - total disaster, My K7.2 has become completely useless except to go online. Cannot save anything to disk, cannot make any file transfers. Any ideas what's going on? Other cards in the card reader aren't accessible either. I only know the mount point of the usbflash install from watching the display at bootup. On the third try, the two external hdds didn't even have icons in the mypc list.

Greetings, otropogo.

While I sympathize with your predicament,

I think you might be more likely to evoke the assistance you need
in another forum; for examples:
Hardware & Booting, General Support and/or MS Windows &c.

This forum is ostensibly for News, and this thread was started by
Gilles, specifically in reference to the upcoming Knoppix 7.3.

I'm no expert, but I'd be surprised if Knoppix 7.3, any more than 7.2,
solves the difficulties you have outlined. I expect a number of us
may just have to learn how to deal with Windows 8 hardware and UEFI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by buymystock

:D:):-D Greetings, utu,
This is great! I am able to hear and understand the
professor while he speaks in the English language during
the recent CeBIT gathering as I click on the link that you sent me.
Merriment and well-being will certainly follow the faithful and
unwavering Knoppix apostles!

---

Klaus has some seemingly worthwhile additions this year. Often with Knoppix as with OSes generally, though, it's one step forward, two steps back. Time will tell. I had to take a rest half way through the lecture, it was a bit slow, but will be back to hear the remainder tomorrow.

[snip] About using Wine: I only have three or four Windows applications I can't do without, and every year or so I check the Wine compatibility list to see if any of them are supported yet. I haven't had one make the list yet. I'd like to ask Klaus if he ever has need of OCR, for instance...An innocent listener would assume from his remarks that there's no need for Windows anymore.

[snip]

The dvd, or better, the usbflash install, when it works, is a very useful reference tool, and Klaus has done a terrific job in making Linux easily and relatively safely available to PC users. But his claim that it works out of the box without problems for 99% of PCs in use today is just nonsense. I'm hoping he tackles (instead of just flirting with) the issue of UEFI BIOS in the second half of the lecture. Because if you have a UEFI BIOS, you absolutely will not be able to boot from the DVD without doing some tweaking of the BIOS. And from what I've read, there are some UEFI BIOSes that won't even allow such tweaking. If he's found a simple fix for 7.3 (my experience is only with 7.2), that will be a significant contribution. I haven't figured out how to boot Puppy on my Haswell laptop yet...

Quote:

---

But his claim that it works out of the box without problems for 99% of PCs in use today is just nonsense.

---

90% ("ninety" at position 1:45 within the video) not 99%.

.
Greetings, otropogo.

Does your Win8 computer have a Legacy Boot option as well as UEFI?
If so, have you tried to boot Knoppix 7.2 with Legacy Boot enabled?

So, is Yuffie Boot something Microsoft came up with to try and stop people from Dual booting other Operating Systems, or does it have some actual benefit? Honestly, I don't particularly like knoppix either, but then again, I don't need a Live distro and I don't need a bunch of software preloaded. The only reason I'm here instead of running vanilla Debian is because Adriane provides the one thing beyond the core necessities I actually need preloaded: a working screen reader plus a few other little things that makes it the only viable Blindman's option I have found for Linux. If Adriane ever gets ported upstream to Debian and joins the various Desktop Envionments as a CD1 variant, I'd probably be going back to debian and never give Knoppix another look. Anyways, has the English lecture on Knoppix and Cbit 2014 been mirrored on YouTube or can anyone provide a link where I can download it(either directly or via bittorrent)? Excluding YouTube, I've yet to find a streaming website that actually works without Flash(and installing flash causes me serious headaches with YouTube). As for Windows programs not being on the Wine Compatibility list: How many have you actually tried running? Its been years since I had to run anything via Wine, but my understanding is that absence from the list could be due to no one who has tried has submitted their results to the list. .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by utu

.
Greetings, otropogo.

Does your Win8 computer have a Legacy Boot option as well as UEFI?
If so, have you tried to boot Knoppix 7.2 with Legacy Boot enabled?

---

Not that I've been able to find. It's an Asus N550JV, and the user manual is total garbage. It's a generic thing that doesn't even provide the specs for the machine. You can't find the word "RAM" in it with a keyword search. There is nothing about the battery specs, the RAM specs, etc., and technical support from ASUS is non-existent. The stock battery is defective, and ASUS not only refuses to sell owners a spare battery, or direct them to an honest retailer of such, but actually tells the user that replacing the batter will void the warranty on the laptop. If the battery needs replacing in Canada, the entire laptop must be shipped several thousand kilometers (in my case) to the only service depot in the country, near Toronto, and then ASUS will decide whether they will pay shipping, one way, both ways, or neither way. Don't buy ASUS in Canada (US support doesn't seem any better, BTW).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffery Mewtamer

So, is Yuffie Boot something Microsoft came up with to try and stop people from Dual booting other Operating Systems, or does it have some actual benefit?.. . .

---

UEFI is not just Microsoft's doing, it's a joint scheme the major PC manufacturers and even Red Hat Linux (from what I've read) have bought into. I'm guessing it's part of a general plan to make the PC user completely locked in to a single channel of support for both hardware and software, including the simplest maintenance (see my rant about my ASUS battery above, which, although hardly used more than three hours off charge since bought, is losing 3% of its charge when shut down after a full charge). You can see this in the connectivity requirements, where when you buy software apps now, or even download freeware, you're required to expose your machine to the net. Sometimes you can't run the software without going online first.

I've bought software on disk which I haven't been able to install because my Windows system couldn't make a connection with the net.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz

90% ("ninety" at position 1:45 within the video) not 99%.

---

Thanks for the correction Werner.

However, I think his 90% is just as much plucking numbers out of thin air as my "99%". In fact, my critique was letting Klaus off easy.

If you recall the early days of Knoppix (and of Linux, to a great extent), one of the main goals was to make linux accessible and usable to those with old legacy PCs. I remember complaining to Klaus about this when he first stopped providing a floppy boot option, and again when he no longer allowed the creation of a persistent image except with the USBflash install.

There are certainly still millions of PCs in use (I have two running here right now, half of my in use PCs) whose BIOS doesn't support booting from USBflash, or from USB at all, for that matter. Knoppix has become seriously crippled on these systems, since neither configurations nor installed applications can be saved when booting from the LiveDV or LiveCD.

I wouldn't be in the least surprised if just these systems make up 10% of all PCs still in use today. And it is, for the most part, their users who particularly need access to a reliable, trustworthy, and free OS.

UEFI has been around for a few years now, and it is so arcane that the top technical support person at a nearby Staples outlet (a major Canadian computer retailer) told me categorically that it would be impossible to boot from any external device on the ASUS laptop I had just bought from his company. He was dead wrong, of course, but I had brought the K7.2 LiveDVD, and his top computer savvy sales rep spent 45 minutes trying unsuccessfully to boot from it on an ASUS laptop with the UEFI BIOS (one version later than the one on my laptop).

I haven't had time to listen to the second half of Klaus's lecture yet, and I hope he addresses this issue adequately. But it's a faint hope...

Quote:

---

There are certainly still millions of PCs in use (I have two running here right now, half of my in use PCs) whose BIOS doesn't support booting from USBflash, or from USB at all, for that matter. Knoppix has become seriously crippled on these systems, since neither configurations nor installed applications can be saved when booting from the LiveDV or LiveCD.

---

In this case you can use the bootonly-CD from Knoppix.

Your problem with UEFI is a problem with your Hardware and the used BIOS not of Knoppix. You have to find and use the propper settings to start other OS; there are enough descriptions available. If your computer refuse to boot with Knoppix CD or Knoppix USB-stick, Knoppix cannot solve this problem for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz

In this case you can use the bootonly-CD from Knoppix.

Your problem with UEFI is a problem with your Hardware and the used BIOS not of Knoppix. You have to find and use the propper settings to start other OS; there are enough descriptions available.

---

Oh, I see. Knoppix is specifically designed for those PCs that happen to work with it right out of the box. No support needed that way. Very elegant...

And as for there being "enough descriptions available" to "start other OS" (whatever that's supposed to mean), most of the English instructions about Linux that one can find on the Web are incorrect or incomplete, yet they live on, like the ghost of Christmas past.

[snip]

Quote:

---

If your computer refuse to boot with Knoppix CD or Knoppix USB-stick, Knoppix cannot solve this problem for you.

---

Oh, oh, now my PC is "refusing" to boot! Call the Polizei!

As I tried to make clear in the previous post, booting from the LiveCD or the LiveDVD doesn't give your a working OS, only a demo system, since you can't save your configuration (as you immediately find out when you try to save your firewall settings) until and unless you've created a USBflash installation. At least, that's how I understand the situation, and Klaus certainly didn't correct me when I first pointed out the issue. His answer was IIRC that usbflash media are cheap and easily accessible.

I can't think of any GOOD reason for denying users a persistent image file on flash media, hdd, CD-RW or DVD-RW that could be used to hold configuration files and user-installed apps by those who can only boot from optical media. Can you??

I CAN think of those who benefit by this denial though - the vendors and manufacturers of PCs and flash media.

As for your comment "Knoppix cannot solve this problem for you" - DUH! - Knoppix is just a Linux distro cooked up by Knopper. Of course it can't solve a problem if the programmer designed it that way. And since it had no such problem for years, it has to be a problem the designer specifically created for his own reasons, without regard to the difficulties created by it for the users.

Unfortunately, the prevailing sentiment among vocal Linux users is that you can't complain about freeware, even if it stabs you in the back. The user's needlessly wasted time and trouble are, of course, worth nothing.

Not sure why one would choose a LiveUSB over a Hard-drive install for running Linux on their own computers(and persistence doesn't seem like a necessity for a rescue environment), but if one can't even get the LiveUSB to boot on their own machines, what chance do they have of getting it to boot on public machines? If uefi is as prevalent on newer machines as implied, this sounds like a compatibility issue that could cripple if not outright destroy several use cases, especially if the problem extends to USB optical drives(required for booting optical media on most netbooks). Is there any easy(as in, can be done from the linux command-line) way of determining whether my machines are infected with uefi? I've never had any boot problems on my vintage 2011 HP desktop(pre-loaded with Win 7, wiped the drive and installed Deian within days of getting it, currently running a heavily stripped down knoppix 7.2) and the only boot isssues my ASUS e1015 DS-03(preloaded with Ubuntu, wiped the drive and installed Knoppix as soon as I got USB optical drives booting) is that you have to hold escape at boot to over-ride booting from hard disk and it doesn't allow enough time for my USB powered optical drive to come online to boot optical from a cold boot(requiring me to ctrl+alt+del for a hot reboot at the menu that gives me the option between booting from hard disc, booting from external(if detected) and entering BIOS), but it would be nice to know just in case uefi gives me problems in the future.

A short history about UEFI and Secure Boot

How to disable Secure Boot

Some experience with ASUS N550JV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Werner P. Schulz

A short history about UEFI and Secure Boot

How to disable Secure Boot

Some experience with ASUS N550JV

---

[snip]

Every one of these discussions confirmed my contention above that Linux advice online is more likely than not to be incorrect and misleading. That is why I expect essential functions such as booting the OS on current hardware to be authoritatively provided by the author or maintainers of the OS, not by user posts in various more or less related forums.

Take the specific link on the ASUS N550JV - a simple and straightforward example.

NO! you don't have to go through all of that rigmarole on the ASUS N550JV to access the UEFI, and disable "secure boot".

All you have to do is to reset the PC while holding down the F2 key, and the UEFI interface will display.


The boot device must also be suitably configured in order for the UEFI to recognize and list it in the boot priority list (after Windows Boot Manager)

When these other bootable devices appear, you can then go into the Boot priority menu, and change the priority, which defaults to Windows Boot Manager, to make the external device first on the list.

Unfortunately, I haven't found the simple instructions apparently needed to reconfigure installation not preconfigured for use with UEFI, or I'd be able to boot Puppy Linux on my Asus. But my guess is that the UEFI needs to find a folder in the device's root directory named EFI.

On the Knoppix 7.2 install, /EFI/boot/ contains four files - bootx32.efi, bootx64.efi, ldlinex.e32 and ldlinux.e64, totalling 588KB.


It appears that the UEFI searches attached devices for the EFI/boot/ folder, then runs one of the bootx...efi files, after which the linux loader takes over.



NB: the actual bootable media (ie. flash card in reader, stick in usb port, DVD or CD) must stay inserted at EVERY bootup to keep their place in the boot priority list.

This is a major change for previous BIOS fuction. For example, I run XP and Puppy Linux, and occasionally Knoppix, on an older Intel Desktop PC that supports USBflash booting.

So long as I leave the USB card reader attached, I can boot from Windows on the hdd just by removing the flash card holding Puppy from the card reader.

To boot with Puppy after using Windows, all I have to do is reinsert the Puppy flash card into the reader, and it will boot. The boot priority order in BIOS doesn't change unless I boot without the card reader attached, in which case, its boot entry is removed automatically. The same is true for the optical drives.

UEFI doesn't allow this. If I boot without the external storage media (presumably with the essential /EFI/boot/ folder and contents) installed, even though the reader or the player/burner are attached and active, UEFI removes the boot entries. The only way to avoid this every time one boots Windows might be ( I haven't actually tried it) to always leave the priority boot media attached, boot holding down the F2 key, and use the boot override option in the UEFI to boot Windows without changing the boot priority settings. But that seems impractical, and possibly even more work.

BOTTOM LINE: In order to boot Linux from USBflash or LiveCD/DVD on the ASUS N550JV, you MUST boot holding down the F2 key, change the boot priority settings in the UEFI, then save and exit, EVERY TIME Following Windows use.

But even this isn't certain. In my experience, the UEFI boot priority setting doesn't save reliably, and half the time, maybe more, on reboot, Windows will come up anyway, and your external boot device will be moved to second place. Since it's a huge time waster (more so in Win8.x than any previous one) to restart from the desktop and reset the UEFI, the only practical way to boot the ASUS externally is as follows:

1. start the ASUS holding down the F2 key (until the interface appears - a real PIA)

2. check the priority setting and change, if necessary, to put the device in first place

3. go to the last drop-down menu, put the cursor on the desired boot media in the boot override portion, and hit ENTER



DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!

I recently upgraded to Windows 8.1, hoping for some improvements. I didn't notice any, but no special problems were noted either.

Then I allowed MS to install some "essential" security updates.

After the updates were installed, I couldn't boot from the Knoppix USBflash install.

When I looked at the UEFI settings, "secure boot" was still disabled, as I had left it.

BUT all external devices were LOCKED! - something I had never done. After toggling them back to unlocked, I was able to boot with Knoppix again.

So - there is an essential, and quite dangerous, difference between BIOS and UEFI - clearly, Windows applications can change the user's UEFI settings without the user being consulted or even warned of these changes!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffery Mewtamer

Not sure why one would choose a LiveUSB over a Hard-drive install for running Linux on their own computers(and persistence doesn't seem like a necessity for a rescue environment),

---

Maybe if you'd had series of Windows installations damaged by crashing Linux boot managers you'd understand. Ideally, the USBflash installation should be able to load the OS entirely into RAM, allowing the USBflash media to remain locked except when being reconfigured or when new apps are installed.

IIRC, Knoppix 7.1 claimed to run entirely in RAM if one had 3GB available. But I was never able to do this. This also makes the installation very vulnerable to corruption by power outages, accidental removal, as well as malware attacks.

With Puppy Linux I can boot from an SD card, choose to load the entire OS into RAM from the card or do it from a file saved to hdd in an NTFS partition. I can save all of my applications to a save file on the hdd, and carry a copy of that file on my SD card too, for backup, if I have the space. That way the user can choose his level of security while retaining easily accessible options for mobility.

Quote:

---

...but if one can't even get the LiveUSB to boot on their own machines, what chance do they have of getting it to boot on public machines? If uefi is as prevalent on newer machines as implied, this sounds like a compatibility issue that could cripple if not outright destroy several use cases, especially if the problem extends to USB optical drives(required for booting optical media on most netbooks). Is there any easy(as in, can be done from the linux command-line) way of determining whether my machines are infected with uefi? I've never had any boot problems on my vintage 2011 HP desktop(pre-loaded with Win 7, wiped the drive and installed Deian within days of getting it, currently running a heavily stripped down knoppix 7.2) and the only boot isssues my ASUS e1015 DS-03(preloaded with Ubuntu, wiped the drive and installed Knoppix as soon as I got USB optical drives booting) is that you have to hold escape at boot to over-ride booting from hard disk and it doesn't allow enough time for my USB powered optical drive to come online to boot optical from a cold boot(requiring me to ctrl+alt+del for a hot reboot at the menu that gives me the option between booting from hard disc, booting from external(if detected) and entering BIOS), but it would be nice to know just in case uefi gives me problems in the future.

---

Why do you say "can't even"? Whether the LiveUSB boots on "your own machine" or another's has nothing to do with ownership. I run several PCs of various vintages. Sometimes I can create a Knoppix USBflash install on one machine and just boot another of my PCs with it without problems. Usually any problems are with the display adaptor or monitor, and these can sometimes be fixed, IF you can see enough of the screen to access the desktop controls. The same is true of Puppy. But sometimes the whole thing just crashes, and no cheatcodes seem to help. It's a lot of work for the user, being in perpetual Beta mode - which is the case for users of most small Linux distros like Knoppix and Puppy.

Just access the BIOS to see if you have UEFI. It sounds like you've had lots of opportunities to do that, and you'd recognize something is wrong right away, if only from the scarcity of options.

I'd say you don't have UEFI, from your comments above. If I had know my very expensive ASUS had no real BIOS, and the implications of that, I wouldn't have bought it, and would be a lot happier now (I wish that were all that's wrong with ASUS hardware, software, support, and warranty service - in fact, I wish I'd never heard of this predatory outfit). Unfortunately, the reviews I read were all misleadingly rosy (and still are...) and I couldn't actually get my hands on one, and bought it sight unseen from Staples in Canada (who proved to be just as dishonest and incompetent as ASUS staff).

BTW Werner, I find your rethreading/renaming of this discussion dishonest.

It's clearly meant to reduce interest in discussion of a complaint that affects just about everyone, and I don't mean just UEFI.[snip]

Sounds like I might be immune(or at least, less exposed) to the problems uefi causes on account of the fact that I haven't had reason to dual boot in nearly a decade, but it does sound like a issue that transcends distro and is hopefully one that gets ironed out before I am forced to upgrade to a machine that comes with uefi. Can't say I'm surprised the retailer and manufacturer are completely useless for any use case beyond the pre-loaded copy of Windows(personally, when I have problems I can resolve myself or via the internet, I do to my college's resident Linux enthusiast). Still, with the way Microsoft seems hell bent on preventing people from booting other OSes, I'm glad I was able to kick them to the curve a long time ago. As for splitting the thread, I would say discussion of the uefi problem was getting to in-depth to be appropriate in its original position. Do think the forum could do with some re-organization into fewer sections no more activity than we have though. Edit: If checking what kind of BIOS I had was as simple as entering my Bios, I wouldn't have bothered asking. I can get into my BIOS(or at least what I assume it to be the BIOS), but visual impairment prevents me from doing anything once I get in or reading any of he information displayed there, and no one in my household knows computers well enough to assist me. Oh well, I'm not having any issues related to booting, and since it will likely be several years before I need to buy another machine(barring unforseen hardware failure), hopefully the problems will be resolved by the time I come into possession of affected hardware. .

Quote:

---

Oh, I see. Knoppix is specifically designed for those PCs that happen to work with it right out of the box. No support needed that way. Very elegant...

---

Did you pay for Knoppix? Did you pay for support? Knoppix is a Live Linux CD, not a commercial Linux where you also can order and buy support.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffery Mewtamer

Sounds like I might be immune(or at least, less exposed) to the problems uefi causes on account of the fact that I haven't had reason to dual boot in nearly a decade, but it does sound like a issue that transcends distro and is hopefully one that gets ironed out before I am forced to upgrade to a machine that comes with uefi. Can't say I'm surprised the retailer and manufacturer are completely useless for any use case beyond the pre-loaded copy of Windows(personally, when I have problems I can resolve myself or via the internet, I do to my college's resident Linux enthusiast). Still, with the way Microsoft seems hell bent on preventing people from booting other OSes, I'm glad I was able to kick them to the curve a long time ago. As for splitting the thread, I would say discussion of the uefi problem was getting to in-depth to be appropriate in its original position. Do think the forum could do with some re-organization into fewer sections no more activity than we have though. Edit: If checking what kind of BIOS I had was as simple as entering my Bios, I wouldn't have bothered asking. I can get into my BIOS(or at least what I assume it to be the BIOS), but visual impairment prevents me from doing anything once I get in or reading any of he information displayed there, and no one in my household knows computers well enough to assist me. Oh well, I'm not having any issues related to booting, and since it will likely be several years before I need to buy another machine(barring unforseen hardware failure), hopefully the problems will be resolved by the time I come into possession of affected hardware. .

---

Business has become much more brazenly predatory in the past decade. We've become an "I'm allright Jack" society, and as business has gotten more monolithic, it goes for the low hanging fruit. Most PC users now (not to mention Mac users) are content to simply accept a disposable, preselected package of software and hardware, with no service except from the manufacturer's contracted service depot, which is probably so underpaid as to make screwing the client a necessity of staying alive.

Government doesn't care about people being ripped off systematically, let alone being incovenienced or having their own small business crippled by the greed priorities of "legitimate" corporations. And any media expose can expect to be hit with a major lawsuit, no matter how well documented the report is.

How else can you explain that a company like ASUS dares to sell a laptop for $1100, advertise it as being upgradable to 16GB, but provide no suitable upgrade chips, and refuse to direct the buyer to a source of a suitable RAM set. How to explain that they would sell a laptop of any kind with a battery which lasts 3 hours on a good day, and not only refuse to sell the buyer a spare, or direct him to a vendor, but even threaten to void the laptop's warranty if the user changes the battery. The only explanation I can come up with is that computer users have become sheep, and the manufacturers and retailers have turned in to wolves with a feeding frenzy.

Good luck with your old machine. I've been running old until last Fall. In fact, the ASUS was my first brand new PC since I bought a Tandy 100 back in 1985. But it's a hard slog. I'm just about to take a sledge hammer to my old hard drives, and am horrified to discover I've accumulated more than 20 over the years. They're not very well behaved either. I wanted to check them first for anything I might want to keep an failed to back up, but half of them won't work with the BIOS of the few older desktop machines I have left.

I've got enough old PC accessories and storage devices to create a small computer museum. but no one is interested in that stuff, and it will all end up polluting some beach in India and poisoning the board pickers who disassemble the precious materials.

Anyway, like so many things in our current social engineering storm, UEFI pretends to be defending us from harm by removing our options. Big business is all about creating captive markets now. And customers are coming to resemble feudal serfs more than free agents in an open market.

(I hope I haven't inadvertently started a new thread).