-
Junior Member
registered user
Getting the monitor in the right resolution
Hi there. I recently did a hard disk install, and now I'm trying to get various things working. One such thing is my monitor. It 'works' fine, but the highest resolution available was 1024x768, and it seemed to insist on running at 100Hz.
After a bit of searching etc., I came to the conclusion that I needed to fiddle with XF86Config-4 a bit. I did so. I commented out a load of lines which one thread suggested, and that did nothing by itself. However, I then looked futher down in the file, and found a bit which seemed to list available resolutions for each bit depth.
The lists for each depth listed "1024x768" as being the highest resolution. I simple stuck "1600x1200" "1280x1024" on the beginning of each of these lines.
This partially worked. Thing is, now everything is running at 1280x1024, which is one of the options I added... But this now seems to be the highest resolution available. I'm currently sitting here in Windows (
) and everything is working happilly at 1600x1200, like it always has done. I'm a bit clueless why "1600x1200" is not available for me in Linux at the moment.
Anybody know what I should be editing/installing to make this work properly?
If it's any help, I'm using an LG F900P monitor. I think this is more of a software thing though, right?
Any help appreciated
-
Senior Member
registered user
Re: Getting the monitor in the right resolution

Originally Posted by
Jez
Hi there. I recently did a hard disk install, and now I'm trying to get various things working. One such thing is my monitor. It 'works' fine, but the highest resolution available was 1024x768, and it seemed to insist on running at 100Hz.
After a bit of searching etc., I came to the conclusion that I needed to fiddle with XF86Config-4 a bit. I did so. I commented out a load of lines which one thread suggested, and that did nothing by itself. However, I then looked futher down in the file, and found a bit which seemed to list available resolutions for each bit depth.
The lists for each depth listed "1024x768" as being the highest resolution. I simple stuck "1600x1200" "1280x1024" on the beginning of each of these lines.
This
partially worked. Thing is, now everything is running at 1280x1024, which is one of the options I added... But this now seems to be the highest resolution available. I'm currently sitting here in Windows (

) and everything is working happilly at 1600x1200, like it always has done. I'm a bit clueless why "1600x1200" is not available for me in Linux at the moment.
Anybody know what I should be editing/installing to make this work properly?
If it's any help, I'm using an LG F900P monitor. I think this is more of a software thing though, right?
Any help appreciated

Go into the config file again and make sure that you have the proper refresh rates set in the section that should look similar to this.
Code:
# KDS Visual Sensations VS 190i
Section "Monitor"
#DisplaySize 350 265 # mm
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "DPMS" "true"
VendorName "KDS"
ModelName "KDS1985"
HorizSync 30 - 95 # DDC-probed
VertRefresh 50 - 160 # DDC-probed
EndSection
You should be using according to this page 30 -107 for the horizontal and 50-160 for the vertical. You may want to take a look into the /var/log/Xfree86.0.log file and see what the driver you are using for the video card will support under linux and it usually has the information probed from the monitor included as well.
-
Junior Member
registered user
Thanks for replying. I've spent quite a lot of time fiddling around with all sorts of settings this afternoon, but I haven't really got anywhere. Actually at one point I made a bit of a mess of things, and spent ages trying to even make X start properly again :P
I found this line in my XFree86.0.log:
(II) VESA(0): Not using mode "1600x1200" (no mode of this name)
Is this a limitation of the drivers then, that 1280x1024 is the highest resolution I can use?
When I was messing with kxconfig I tried using various drivers but the only ones that seem to work are vesa. I have a Radeon 9600XT, just to let you know.
Similar Threads
-
By alghieri in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
Replies: 2
Last Post: 05-06-2005, 04:09 PM
-
By mail2me in forum Laptops
Replies: 2
Last Post: 10-26-2004, 01:23 AM
-
By abouzeis in forum Laptops
Replies: 7
Last Post: 02-10-2004, 04:45 PM
-
By comanam in forum General Support
Replies: 1
Last Post: 12-09-2003, 07:37 PM
-
By new dumbie in forum General Support
Replies: 7
Last Post: 09-20-2003, 12:14 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Netac DDR4 32GB 16GB DDR4 3200MHz UDIMM C16 Desktop Internal Memory RAM Kit
$99.99

Major Brand 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-12800U DDR3-1600MHz DDR3-12800 DESKTOP RAM NON-ECC
$29.99

RAMAXEL Lenovo 32GB LPDDR5X CAMM2 7500MHz Laptop RAM | UNTESTED
$445.00

Samsung 8GB DDR4 SO-DIMM PC4-3200AA 260-Pin RAM M471A1G44BB0-CWE Module
$29.25

Samsung 16GB (1x16GB) DDR4-3200 PC4-3200AA SO-DIMM 260-Pin RAM - Tested
$55.00

DDR4 Laptop RAM 4GB 8GB 16GB 32GB 2400 2666 3200 Samsung Hynix
$30.00

A-Tech 8GB DDR3 1600 PC3-12800 Laptop SODIMM 204-Pin Memory RAM PC3L DDR3L 1x 8G
$21.68

Samsung 16GB (1x16GB) DDR4-3200 PC4-3200AA SO-DIMM 260-Pin RAM - Tested
$55.00

Dell 16GB PC4-21300 (DDR4-2666) Memory (SNPPWR5TC16G)
$89.99

G.SKILL Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) 3200MHz DDR4 Ram - Tested
$74.95