>>
]ok... this is getting really really really
confusing...
>>




If you were to randomise a character, then you
could have a sequence were the first character
represents the ascii offset needed to restore the
following character. And no two generations would
be the same, well, within the limits of the
random pool used, of course.

Something like that could just output ...

"offset char offset char etc"

But that would be dead easy to crack.

It would be nice to see what it actually looks
like...

I'm sure no one will try to use it again'st you



jm