Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 1st partiton on the HD for correct instalation?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    9

    1st partiton on the HD for correct instalation?

    Hi all

    First of all, say that I am new to linux and Knoppix is fascinating.
    I want to install it on my HD, but reading the FAQ´s I´ve seen tha the knoppix partition must be the "first" in the HD.
    In my second, slave HD, I have already a partition for backup data from windows and a swap partition. If I create a new partioton for knoppix, it will be ok?? If not, there´s any solution to this?
    2.- the bootloader will be installed in the master HD? How can I install the bootloader in a flopy disk?
    Please help....

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Member registered user
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    44
    No, any partition will be fine, so long as It's marked 'Bootable' and is recognized in your BIOS.

    It will simply write to your MBR (if you let it) and you'll be able to choose it from whichever bootloader you have. (by default, knoppix will install Lilo to your MBR. You can tell it not to do this during installation, however)

    I myself run several operating systems on any given computer, accross multiple harddrives.

  3. #3
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    205
    the knoppix partition must be the "first" in the HD
    It's Windows that requires this, and it can be fooled with the proper bootloader settings.

    Right now I have Linuxes on partitions 7, 8, 10, and 11 of one computer, and they all use 5 for swap and 6 for /home. (Partition 9 has NetBSD, which also does fine on a logical partition.) BIOS can only see 4 partitions, and I never mark one as active (bootable) - bootloaders don't need it.

    Do you mind having LILO or GrUB in the Master Boot Record? They work great, honest! But sure, you can boot from a floppy. My other machine does this now (for WinME and some Unixes). I've been meaning to install to the MBR, but I've swapped hard drives in and out and haven't gotten around to it.

    Also, bootloaders save the original MBR and can restore it if you don't like how they work.

    Besides checking the documentation installed with Linux (man lilo and man grub) there's lots of info. at The Linux Documentation Project, for example http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/LILO.

    Hope this helps!

    -- Ed

  4. #4
    Administrator Site Admin-
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,441
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_ed
    Windows is the operating system that requires this, and it can be fooled with the proper bootloader settings.
    I don't think any OS really requires this (although Windows does have a bad additude when it installs some times). I have had multiple copies of the same version of Windows on the same hard drive and could boot between them with little trouble. What the "first" partition is isn't even clear. Would this mean the one closest to the inside or the outside of the disk? Would it mean the"first" on in the partition table, even if that was in the middle of the disk? Actually, you can't even define what the first entry in the partition table is, some MS os's read the partition table "top-down" while others read it "bottom-up". All you can really say is that there are 4 primary partition (and schemes to have more by maintaining the other partitions elsewhere and swapping them into the 4 slots as needed) and that a primary partition can be "extended" to hold multiple logical partitions. And many (but not all) MS OS's will even boot from a logical partition just fine (although MS doesn't advertise this and doing the install may take some tricks), as will Linux.

Similar Threads

  1. HD Instalation problem
    By sty2000 in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-27-2007, 01:15 PM
  2. Knx HD instalation freezes until 97% or 98%
    By knxbegin in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 12:55 PM
  3. From HD Instalation to File ISO
    By ary in forum Customising & Remastering
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-06-2005, 05:39 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-13-2003, 08:21 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-12-2003, 12:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


IBM System X3850-X5 Server w/4x Intel  Xeon E7-4870 CPU , 512 GB DDR3 RAM,NO HDD picture

IBM System X3850-X5 Server w/4x Intel Xeon E7-4870 CPU , 512 GB DDR3 RAM,NO HDD

$1599.99



IBM 7915 AC1 M4 E27R704 Server Intel 2650V2 32GB RAM NO HDD w/ 2x 750w PSU picture

IBM 7915 AC1 M4 E27R704 Server Intel 2650V2 32GB RAM NO HDD w/ 2x 750w PSU

$225.00



Unused IBM 09P0037 MAINBOARD For  RS/6000 7044-170 P-Series picture

Unused IBM 09P0037 MAINBOARD For RS/6000 7044-170 P-Series

$375.00



IBM QRadar xx29 2x Xeon E5-2650v4 2x 900W PSU M5120 12x 3.5

IBM QRadar xx29 2x Xeon E5-2650v4 2x 900W PSU M5120 12x 3.5" Bay Server No RAM

$179.99



IBM Power 8 S822L Server 8247-22L POWER8 Enterprise 256GB RAM 2x 00KV626 CPU picture

IBM Power 8 S822L Server 8247-22L POWER8 Enterprise 256GB RAM 2x 00KV626 CPU

$999.99



IBM SYSTEM X3500 M3 SERVER 7380AC1 TOWER Server XEON E5620 8GB RAID SEE NOTES picture

IBM SYSTEM X3500 M3 SERVER 7380AC1 TOWER Server XEON E5620 8GB RAID SEE NOTES

$110.30



IBM System x3550 M3 1U Server 2x Xeon E5645, 192GB RAM, 2x 300GB HDD (7944-AC1) picture

IBM System x3550 M3 1U Server 2x Xeon E5645, 192GB RAM, 2x 300GB HDD (7944-AC1)

$150.00



1 X IBM 720 POWER SERVER WITH 32 GB RAM picture

1 X IBM 720 POWER SERVER WITH 32 GB RAM

$344.97



IBM ADP Server Type 7870 AC1 NO HDD | 128GB RAM PC3L | 2 x Xeon  E5620 picture

IBM ADP Server Type 7870 AC1 NO HDD | 128GB RAM PC3L | 2 x Xeon E5620

$199.99



IBM EMC 091-000-091 17 Inch Rackmount LCD Keyboard KVM Console 03N7012 picture

IBM EMC 091-000-091 17 Inch Rackmount LCD Keyboard KVM Console 03N7012

$109.99