-
hub vs switch
I have remastered knoppix for use at work,
When i boot connected to a 100 meg hub everthing works,
When I connect the pc to a switch (cisco 2950t24's)
etho doesn't come up...i have intel 10/100 onboard lan.
Does anybody have any idea why this is happening or des anybody know how i can get a cisco port to emulate a hub (i.e duplex settings force 100 meg)
Thanks
-
Administrator
Site Admin-
Re: hub vs switch

Originally Posted by
djarum
I have remastered knoppix for use at work,
When i boot connected to a 100 meg hub everthing works,
When I connect the pc to a switch (cisco 2950t24's)
etho doesn't come up...i have intel 10/100 onboard lan.
Does anybody have any idea why this is happening or des anybody know how i can get a cisco port to emulate a hub (i.e duplex settings force 100 meg)
Thanks
Generally a switch is better than a hub, and it should work fine in this case.
I have and use both. Bit the only reason I got the hub was to be able to use programs like Ethereal to "sniff the wire" and examine packets to be able to identify complex network issues. I almost any other case a switch is a better choice. I use switches all the time with knoppix and have seen no problems with any of the ones that I use.
Did you just throw in that top line about remastering Knoppix to add an extra variable to the problem? Does this not also happen with the original Knoppix CD, or are you telling us it is limited to your remaster?
On the assumption that it's not a remastered CD issue, it seems like it is a cisco 2950t24 issue or a cabel issue. I don't know the cisco 2950t24 but you might want to do some reading and be sure that there are no surprises. I would also look closely at your cabels and be sure that all is right. Even if they work with the switch, inspect the cabels closely. For example, I have one switch that will auto sense the cabel and correct for things if a cross over cabel is used. Other switches I have will not do this. So if I were to have a cross over cabel in the mix one of my switches would work fine, but I would have the problem you indicate if I swapped it out with a different switch.
-
It seems to be a problem with either how dhcp is "reconized" by the card in linux...
the 2 paths that i have gotten to are that
1. I have one default vlan set up for everthing on my network and knoppix doesn't like the vlan identifier and doesn't know what to do with it , while windows disregards it, if the vlaning is a ciso propitary encapuslation and used only on my cisco switches if I plug a hub into one of my cisco switch ports I am wondering if the switch is smart enough to parse the dhcp request without sending the vlan idenitifer and the linux box works correctly.
2. A portfast setting on the switch ....I am wondering if I am having spanning tree type issuses and turning on portfast on the affected ports would speed up my blocking and transport across my lan.
the linux remaster works like a charm at home on my motorola router/ switch and works on my devel network at work...which is a 24 linksys etherfast plugged into my cisco 2950t's which get dhcp from a pix 515e which sits behind a 3606 cisco router......when i plug directly into my network, bypassing the hub, is when the image doesn't bring up eth0 and that is no good for my end user in this case. Even a sudo netcardcnfig will not get an ip, but plug it back into a hub and I'm fine...
Has anybody ever ran across somthing like this? or have any ideas that I could try.
I know it's not the cable...I used a bunch to test that, and the nic works fine....I know it's the switches or the pix am wondering if anybody has any settings I could try besides the 2 I mentioned above....
Thanks
and harry thanks for mentioning ethereal...I'm going to enable span and try to sniff the port in the morning and see where the negotion bombs out
thanks again
-
Administrator
Site Admin-

Originally Posted by
djarum
1. I have one default vlan set up for everthing on my network and knoppix doesn't like the vlan identifier
Yea, I expect you're right. I've never worked with the vlan stuff, and I could see how different equipment may give different results there. My previous post was intended to apply to a simple boot of Knoppix from CD and basic switch and hub stuff, nothing complex.
Similar Threads
-
By senorian in forum Hardware & Booting
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-20-2004, 08:19 PM
-
By bob58 in forum General Support
Replies: 1
Last Post: 03-23-2004, 05:38 PM
-
By regus in forum Networking
Replies: 6
Last Post: 01-29-2004, 03:33 PM
-
By efi360 in forum General Support
Replies: 8
Last Post: 08-17-2003, 07:52 AM
-
By audioaficionado in forum General Support
Replies: 4
Last Post: 01-11-2003, 01:08 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4 2.20GHz 55M 22-CORES LGA2011-3 Server Processor 145W SR2JS
$84.49

Dell EMC PowerEdge R440 Xeon silver 4215 2.5GHz 16 GB ram 2x 550W PSU No HDD
$275.00

Lenovo ThinkStation P520 Intel Xeon W-2123 3.6GHz 900W - NO RAM/ GPU/ HDD/ OS
$189.98

Dell Precision T5820 Workstation 3.70GHz W-2135 No RAM/ GPU/ HDD/ OS
$179.98

Intel Xeon Gold 6230 2.1 GHz Processor - SRF8W
$29.00

Matched Pair _ Intel Xeon E5-2698 V4 2.2GHz 20-Core Processor CPU LGA2011 SR2JW
$94.99

Intel Xeon E5-2680 V4 CPU 2.4~3.3GHz 14-Core 35M LGA 2011-3 R3 Server SR2N7 120W
$16.99

HP Z8 G4 Z8G4 Barebone Workstation w/ Intel Xeon Silver - No HDD No RAM No GPU
$449.99

Intel Xeon Processor E5-2687W V4 SR2NA 3.00GHz Broadwell 160W LGA2011 12-Core
$36.00

Intel Xeon E5-2680 V2 2.8GHz 10-Core 25MB 8GT/s SR1A6 LGA2011 B Grade Server CPU
$7.95