Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Suggestion and mockup: Klik installer

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3

    Suggestion and mockup: Klik installer

    Hello,

    I've made a small Klik installer mockup that can be found here http://www.geocities.com/reflash8435...uggestion.html

    Please let me know what do you think.

    SnOp

  2. #2
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,159
    Hi SnOp,

    thanks for your creative ideas. As you might know, klik doesn't "install" anything. It just produces cmg files that do not need to be installed and can be placed in any location you want.

    klik is designed to have no need to be configured/ask questions. It should work by just clicking "OK" - that's all the user should be asked. Hence, klik should have as little interface as neccessary.

    Advanced users are free to move cmg files to other locations, e.g. /opt.

    Please also keep in mind that klik must run on KDE, GNOME, and pure shell - using the respective native user interface.

    So in summary, I don't think a GUI like the one you suggested will be neccessary and possible anytime soon.

    Greetings,
    probono

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3
    thanks for your creative ideas. As you might know, klik doesn't "install" anything. It just produces cmg files that do not need to be installed and can be placed in any location you want.
    Well it does, in fact, install an application even if it's "just" a cmg file. You may think on this kind of gui as a .klikrc configurator more than an installer. Most users will want to choose where to install the files and keep this settings for future usage. Introducing a .klikrc file is needed, from my point of view, but it's not useful if that's not easly dicoverable/editable (specially for not so advanced users).

    klik is designed to have no need to be configured/ask questions. It should work by just clicking "OK" - that's all the user should be asked. Hence, klik should have as little interface as neccessary.
    Installation would be "one klik away". Instead of pressing the first "OK" in the current dialog people would press "Install". The difference would be that when pressing "Install" people would know where the application will be installed and wheter or not it would be executed. It's too intrusive IMHO to execute an application without asking the user at least.

    Please also keep in mind that klik must run on KDE, GNOME, and pure shell - using the respective native user interface.
    That's right. In fact this dialog just will show in case of a user running KDE. For Gnome/Xfce users a GTK+ version could be made. But, anyway, the current scripts (.klik and so on) should be used in case the installer can't be found.

    So in summary, I don't think a GUI like the one you suggested will be neccessary and possible anytime soon.
    I must agree with you. Perhaps is too soon to introduce a gui like this for klik. But it would be great for distributions who aim for a more polished desktop experience.

    Keep up with the good work.

    SnOp

Similar Threads

  1. phpbb suggestion
    By hunkychop in forum Ideas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2007, 05:35 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 09:45 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-06-2006, 05:19 PM
  4. suggestion: dmidecode, mtx
    By apb25 in forum Ideas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2005, 09:30 PM
  5. Replies: 210
    Last Post: 12-04-2004, 03:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Samsung - 980 1TB PCIe 3.0 NVMe Internal Gaming SSD M.2 picture

Samsung - 980 1TB PCIe 3.0 NVMe Internal Gaming SSD M.2

$139.99



Samsung - T5 1TB External USB Type C Portable Solid State Drive - Deep black picture

Samsung - T5 1TB External USB Type C Portable Solid State Drive - Deep black

$129.99



SanDisk - Extreme Portable 1TB External USB-C NVMe Portable Solid State Drive picture

SanDisk - Extreme Portable 1TB External USB-C NVMe Portable Solid State Drive

$159.99



Crucial - MX500 1TB 3D NAND SATA 2.5 Inch Internal Solid State Drive picture

Crucial - MX500 1TB 3D NAND SATA 2.5 Inch Internal Solid State Drive

$99.99



MDD 1TB 5400RPM 9.5mm 2.5

MDD 1TB 5400RPM 9.5mm 2.5" SATA 3.0Gb/s Gaming PS3/PS4 Internal Hard Drive

$39.99



1 TB Solid State Drive Internal SSD Hard Drive up to 500 MB/s SATA 6.0 GB/s A++ picture

1 TB Solid State Drive Internal SSD Hard Drive up to 500 MB/s SATA 6.0 GB/s A++

$68.55



Samsung - 980 1TB SSD PCIe 3.0 M.2 NVMe Internal Gaming Solid State Drive - 2021 picture

Samsung - 980 1TB SSD PCIe 3.0 M.2 NVMe Internal Gaming Solid State Drive - 2021

$119.95



SAMSUNG 980 M.2 2280 1TB PCI-Express 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 V-NAND MLC Internal Solid picture

SAMSUNG 980 M.2 2280 1TB PCI-Express 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 V-NAND MLC Internal Solid

$109.99



WL 1TB 64MB Cache 5400RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5

WL 1TB 64MB Cache 5400RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive (DVR, NAS, PC)

$29.95



Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 1TB Internal PCI Express 3.0 x4 (NVMe) Solid State Dri... picture

Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 1TB Internal PCI Express 3.0 x4 (NVMe) Solid State Dri...

$149.99