-
Junior Member
registered user
[Bug ?!] Initrd and Linuxrc
Hi!
I have a little question about booting of knoppix...
Well, start with theory of booting with Initrd:
- kernel load into memory initrd image
- decompress it
- execute LINUXRC (yes, must be an executable or shell file called linuxrc
)
- after that or linuxrc call /sbin/init or it's called automatically, otherwise kernel panic
Pratically
- knoppix put in boot command line a line like init=/etc/init
After many test that I do, I see the param init (in this case /etc/init) it's execute only if present another param like root=/dev/ram0
I see /etc/init in INITRD of knoppix contain a small script like
Code:
/linuxrc
exec /sbin/init < /dev/console > /dev/console ...
Hi!
I have a little question about booting of knoppix...
Well, start with theory of booting with Initrd:
- kernel load into memory initrd image
- decompress it
- execute LINUXRC (yes, must be an executable or shell file called linuxrc
)
- after that or linuxrc call /sbin/init or it's called automatically, otherwise kernel panic
Pratically
- knoppix put in boot command line a line like init=/etc/init
After many test that I do, I see the param init (in this case /etc/init) it's execute only if present another param like root=/dev/ram0
I see /etc/init in INITRD of knoppix contain a small script like
Code:
/linuxrc
exec /sbin/init < /dev/console > /dev/console ...
I think that script and relative boot parameter is useless, infact knoppix boot correctly without "init" file in /etc and without bootparam "init=/etc/init".
But..my question is: if it's useless, why is still present?
I'm forgot something?
Cheers
-
Junior Member
registered user
I read that knoppix can use INITRAMFS..But minirt.gz isn't an archive of INITRAMFS
-
Senior Member
registered user
Re: [Bug ?!] Initrd and Linuxrc

Originally Posted by
Frunktz
I think that script and relative boot parameter is useless, infact knoppix boot correctly without "init" file in /etc and without bootparam "init=/etc/init".
Confirmed. Knoppix 4.0.2 will boot just fine without the "init=..."
But..my question is: if it's useless, why is still present?
I'm forgot something?
Probably a vestige. Naturally, you're free to take in out in your own remasters.
Regards,
- Robert
http://www.cwelug.org
Similar Threads
-
By chris32000 in forum German Forum
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-19-2009, 09:39 AM
-
By bongski55 in forum The Lounge
Replies: 2
Last Post: 05-11-2004, 11:56 AM
-
By darthczyz in forum Customising & Remastering
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-08-2004, 01:15 PM
-
By alex52 in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
Replies: 4
Last Post: 02-01-2004, 06:08 AM
-
By thomas in forum Customising & Remastering
Replies: 3
Last Post: 01-19-2003, 02:39 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Apple Chess Vintage Software w/ Floppy Disks & Manual, MPN CDA050
$295.00

Apple Mac OS9 Cloth Banner Think Different 64 x 24 inches NEW ORIGINAL Vintage
$99.99

VINTAGE UMPC Fujitsu Lifebook P1120 8.9" Touchscreen Crusoe 800MHz - Windows XP
$349.95

Vintage Apple Macintosh M0110 Keyboard with Coiled Cable & M0100 Mouse Bundle
$180.00

Coronado Leather Cross Body Travel Satchel Vintage Lockable Conceal Carry Pocket
$200.00

Fourth Dimension Systems FDS 1084 16K RAM Expansion Card Vintage For Apple
$100.00

Orange Micro Vintage Controller Card Expansion Board Compatible For Apple
$65.00

Vintage 5.25" Internal Floppy Drive Mechanism Assembly Internal Mechanism Unit
$80.00

Vintage 2006 17” iMac w/ Apple Keyboard - It Works
$79.99

ARexx User's Reference Manual The REXX Language for Amiga 1000 Vintage Computing
$22.12