-
Junior Member
registered user
[Bug ?!] Initrd and Linuxrc
Hi!
I have a little question about booting of knoppix...
Well, start with theory of booting with Initrd:
- kernel load into memory initrd image
- decompress it
- execute LINUXRC (yes, must be an executable or shell file called linuxrc
)
- after that or linuxrc call /sbin/init or it's called automatically, otherwise kernel panic
Pratically
- knoppix put in boot command line a line like init=/etc/init
After many test that I do, I see the param init (in this case /etc/init) it's execute only if present another param like root=/dev/ram0
I see /etc/init in INITRD of knoppix contain a small script like
Code:
/linuxrc
exec /sbin/init < /dev/console > /dev/console ...
Hi!
I have a little question about booting of knoppix...
Well, start with theory of booting with Initrd:
- kernel load into memory initrd image
- decompress it
- execute LINUXRC (yes, must be an executable or shell file called linuxrc
)
- after that or linuxrc call /sbin/init or it's called automatically, otherwise kernel panic
Pratically
- knoppix put in boot command line a line like init=/etc/init
After many test that I do, I see the param init (in this case /etc/init) it's execute only if present another param like root=/dev/ram0
I see /etc/init in INITRD of knoppix contain a small script like
Code:
/linuxrc
exec /sbin/init < /dev/console > /dev/console ...
I think that script and relative boot parameter is useless, infact knoppix boot correctly without "init" file in /etc and without bootparam "init=/etc/init".
But..my question is: if it's useless, why is still present?
I'm forgot something?
Cheers
-
Junior Member
registered user
I read that knoppix can use INITRAMFS..But minirt.gz isn't an archive of INITRAMFS
-
Senior Member
registered user
Re: [Bug ?!] Initrd and Linuxrc

Originally Posted by
Frunktz
I think that script and relative boot parameter is useless, infact knoppix boot correctly without "init" file in /etc and without bootparam "init=/etc/init".
Confirmed. Knoppix 4.0.2 will boot just fine without the "init=..."
But..my question is: if it's useless, why is still present?
I'm forgot something?
Probably a vestige. Naturally, you're free to take in out in your own remasters.
Regards,
- Robert
http://www.cwelug.org
Similar Threads
-
By chris32000 in forum German Forum
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-19-2009, 09:39 AM
-
By bongski55 in forum The Lounge
Replies: 2
Last Post: 05-11-2004, 11:56 AM
-
By darthczyz in forum Customising & Remastering
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-08-2004, 01:15 PM
-
By alex52 in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
Replies: 4
Last Post: 02-01-2004, 06:08 AM
-
By thomas in forum Customising & Remastering
Replies: 3
Last Post: 01-19-2003, 02:39 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Fanxiang 1/2/5/10Pcs 2.5'' SATA SSD Lot 1TB 2TB 4TB 512GB 256GB TLC Internal SSD
$755.99

Samsung SSD Solid State Drive MZ-VL25120 512GB
$54.99

ON SALE TURBOLINK EVO 4TB V-HAND SSD 2.5 SATA III Internal Solid State Drive
$199.99

Toshiba THNSN81Q92CSE 1920GB SATA 2.5 Solid State Drive
$199.00

Samsung 256 GB Internal SATA SSD Fully Tested 80-99% Health
$28.00

Samsung 860 EVO 250GB, SATA III, 2.5" Internal Solid State Drive - Black
$29.00

SAMSUNG SSD 512GB 500GB 480GB 256GB 250GB 240GB SSD 2.5 Solide State Drive 6Gbps
$40.99

256GB mSATA SSD DRIVE MIXED BRAND TESTED WORKING
$23.50

Western Digital Blue 3D NAND 250GB 2.5" SATA III Internal SSD - WDS250G2B0A
$29.99

Netac 120GB 256GB 1TB 2TB Internal SSD 2.5'' SATAIII 6Gb/s Solid State Drive lot
$119.99