-
Senior Member
registered user
rolfhub:
Good for you. I have had systems run KDE miserably on 196Meg with 4 or 8 Meg Video Ram. I have NOT encountered a system that did not run KDE acceptably with 256Meg or more. Hence the statement I made. It's a subjective observation and there could always be the exception. It's also personal opinion as what "Run Well" would mean. A system with only 128 Meg SHARING memory with a GPU, might NOT run well. I have seen many people try to boot Knoppix with KDE on a system that would be borderline with a desktop like iceWM. They can get it to run, but it is SLOW and not running acceptably. It could also cause an unusually long boot time.
-
Junior Member
registered user

Originally Posted by
ckamin
rolfhub:
Good for you. I have had systems run KDE miserably on 196Meg with 4 or 8 Meg Video Ram. I have NOT encountered a system that did not run KDE acceptably with 256Meg or more. Hence the statement I made. It's a subjective observation and there could always be the exception. It's also personal opinion as what "Run Well" would mean. A system with only 128 Meg SHARING memory with a GPU, might NOT run well. I have seen many people try to boot Knoppix with KDE on a system that would be borderline with a desktop like iceWM. They can get it to run, but it is SLOW and not running acceptably. It could also cause an unusually long boot time.
Well, I can guarantee for nothing, it did work for me, but of course, it was quite slow (but still usable). I don't know what it would be like booting the mentioned system with the newest version of Knoppix/Kanotix/etc. (I tried it about 1,5 years ago). I think it also depends much on the northbride and southbridge (how well they are supported), not only on the processor and RAM.
Also shared RAM is always MUCH slower than separate RAM (I wouldn't recommend to anyone to buy a system with shared RAM (which is quite common with notebooks).
-
Senior Member
registered user
rolfhub:
I have one OLD Pentium2 400 with 128Meg of ram and a 16 meg Video adaptor. It runs KDE BETTER than icewm or even FluxBox in some distros. Knoppix 4.0.2 is great on it. I have another one with an 8Meg Graphics card and it runs so slow, it makes Windows look good! I just like to have as much horsepower as I can muster in a machine and then give it a shot. It's dependant on other things besides RAM. Laptops are rather troublesome as well. More display issues than it's worth sometimes. I have a few notebooks that work just fine with Knoppix and a couple that are problematic. Can't wait to try out 5.0.1. Downloaded both the DVD and the CD. Let's hope for the best!
-
Junior Member
registered user

Originally Posted by
ckamin
rolfhub:
I have one OLD Pentium2 400 with 128Meg of ram and a 16 meg Video adaptor. It runs KDE BETTER than icewm or even FluxBox in some distros. Knoppix 4.0.2 is great on it. I have another one with an 8Meg Graphics card and it runs so slow, it makes Windows look good! I just like to have as much horsepower as I can muster in a machine and then give it a shot.
Well, much horsepower is always a good thing 

Originally Posted by
ckamin
It's dependant on other things besides RAM. Laptops are rather troublesome as well. More display issues than it's worth sometimes. I have a few notebooks that work just fine with Knoppix and a couple that are problematic. Can't wait to try out 5.0.1. Downloaded both the DVD and the CD. Let's hope for the best!
Yes, notebooks seem to be a bit harder to get running smoothly than "normal" desktop hardware, but most of the time, the problems are not too severe, so one can work with them. I wish you the best of luck
Similar Threads
-
By sonsrey in forum Hardware & Booting
Replies: 3
Last Post: 03-10-2010, 03:49 PM
-
By destro in forum MS Windows & New to Linux
Replies: 4
Last Post: 04-01-2007, 11:08 PM
-
By sid_galt in forum Hardware & Booting
Replies: 39
Last Post: 11-27-2005, 10:02 PM
-
By codeforge in forum Customising & Remastering
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-16-2004, 05:06 PM
-
By SK in forum General Support
Replies: 4
Last Post: 07-30-2003, 09:25 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Seagate ST6000NM0115 6TB 256MB 7200RPM 3.5" SATA 6.0Gb/s Enterprise Hard Drive
$159.99

Seagate Exos X14 10TB 7200RPM 3.5" SAS 12Gb/s Hard Drive HDD ST10000NM0528
$165.00

Seagate 14TB Exos X14 7200RPM SATA 6Gb/s 256MB 3.5" Enterprise HDD ST14000NM0408
$354.99

Seagate Exos X16 ST10000NM010G 10TB 7200RPM SAS 12Gb/s 3.5" 512e/4Kn HDD
$199.00

ST6000NM0034 DELL 6TB 7.2K 12G SAS 512E 3.5" ENTERPRISE HARD DRIVE 8D1V4 08D1V4
$54.99

HGST HUS724040ALA640 4TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.5" Internal Desktop Drive 100% Health
$78.00

Dell ST91000640SS 1TB 2.5" 6Gb/s 64MB 7.2K RPM SAS Hard Drive Dell P/N: 0VXTPX
$16.99

Seagate ST2000NM0045 2TB 3.5" 7.2K 12G SAS Server HDD
$19.99

MG08SCA16TE Toshiba 16TB 7.2K SAS 12gb/s 512e 3.5inch HDD HDEPN10GEA51 NEW
$454.44

Western Digital HUS726T4TAL5204 4TB 7.2K SAS 12Gb/s 3.5" 512e HDD NetApp X375A
$69.00