@ kl522

I would like to sign on to krishna's post #5 and
suggest Klaus K. probably has good reasons for lagging
the squashfs effort. Among other reasons is Ubuntu
and Fedora are plowing this ground. KK is a one-man
effort AFAIK.

This is not to diminish your effort or Forester's,
merely to suggest that we keep our discussions relative
to computer metrics, and not spend any time on long-
distance prognostications on ulterior motives.

Foresters decompress times on 'a machine at work'
seemed attractive. What were its parameters?
How does that machine compare to my Laptop/SDCard rig?