Quote Originally Posted by dinosoep View Post
kl522, isn't unionfs nearly the same as aufs but more maintained?
unionfs is the predecessor to the current aufs2.1, as result, 'unionfs' is used interchangeably to mean 'aufs'. I ***THINK*** UNIONFS is no more maintained.

and you still need cloop when you patched it to use squashfs?
Realistically speaking for my usage, cloop can be skipped but I try as much as possible try to also get it compiled to maintain backward compatibility. It depends on how 'minirt.gz' has been modified.