Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: LILO woe

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6

    LILO woe

    I'm having problems with LILO now that I've done the HDD install. I've been using a boot disk until now but I decided to install LILO instead. When I try and run /sbin/lilo, I'm greeted with the following response:

    Code:
    LILO is unable to correctly determine the device codes assigned to two
    of your disks by the System BIOS.  Consequently, it seems to have guessed
    wrong.  The following conflict needs to be resolved with explicit
        "disk=/dev/...  bios=0x??" lines in '/etc/lilo.conf'.
    
    Fatal: Bios device code 0x80 is being used by two disks
            /dev/ataraid/d0 (0x7200)  and  /dev/hdg (0x2200)
    This is a bit of a bugger because these disks are both attached to my RAID controller (PDC20276, currently being used as ATA133 rather than RAID). The two disks attached to the controller are /dev/hde (/dev/ataraid/d0 - Windows install) and /dev/hdg (/dev/ataraid/d1 - Linux). I've never had any problems installing LILO to the MBR of /dev/hde in the past when I've been using Mandrake/RH/SuSE so I'm not sure how to resolve this. My /etc/lilo.conf hasn't been changed from the one created during the HDD install:

    Code:
    boot=/dev/hde
    vga=791
    prompt
    timeout=50
    append = "hda=scsi hdb=scsi hdc=scsi hdd=scsi hde=scsi hdf=scsi hdg=scsi hdh=scsi apm=power-off nomce"
    
    image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.20-xfs
            label=knoppix
            root=/dev/hdg5
            read-only
            initrd=/boot/initrd.gz
    
    ## A Windows installation, example for partition 1 on first IDE harddisk
    # other=/dev/hda1
    #       label=dos
    #       optional
    #       table=/dev/hda
    Can anyone help?

  2. #2
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    colorado springs, colorado
    Posts
    1,933
    You might try adding something like this to lilo.conf:

    Code:
    # Overrides the default mapping between harddisk names and the BIOS'
    # harddisk order. Use with caution.
    disk=/dev/hde
        bios=0x81
    
    disk=/dev/hdg
        bios=0x80
    First try with just "disk=/dev/hde bios=0x81" and if that doesn't work try adding the second one. Make sense?

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6
    Yeah I've already tried doing that. When I did disk=/dev/hde bios=0x80 it gave me the same error message but said that this time it was /dev/hdg and /dev/ataraid/d1 that had the same BIOS code (as you'd hope since they're the same disk!)

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1
    Hi,

    I'm having the same problem. I am not running RAID, but I do have 7 devices, 4 on the 2 regular channels and 3 on the 2 HPT channels (one slave is empty).

    It's complaining about the following:

    Code:
    root@knoppix-klb:~# /sbin/lilo
    Warning: Unable to determine video adapter in use in the present system.
    Added Linux *
    Skipping /vmlinuz.old
    Added Other(hdg1)
    
    LILO is unable to correctly determine the device codes assigned to two
    of your disks by the System BIOS.  Consequently, it seems to have guessed
    wrong.  The following conflict needs to be resolved with explicit
        "disk=/dev/...  bios=0x??" lines in '/etc/lilo.conf'.
    
    Fatal: Bios device code 0x81 is being used by two disks
            /dev/hdg (0x2200)  and  /dev/hde (0x2100)
    root@knoppix-klb:~#
    I tried uncommenting both of the "bios" lines (first the first, then both) and it still gave me the same error. As the original poster said, I have a boot floppy which I can continue to use but I'd like to be able to configure it to boot from the hard drive. What am I doing wrong?

    The "bios" lines are:

    Code:
    #disk=/dev/hde
    #    bios=0x81
    
    #disk=/dev/sda
    #    bios=0x80
    Only one of them refers to one of the drives in conflict (hde and hdg), but I don't want to break anything so I'm stopping here.

    Why would two drives have the same device code? Windows 2000 doesn't complain about it (for reference, not to start a flame war).

    If you need further information about my system I'll be happy to provide it. Thanks!

  5. #5
    Senior Member registered user
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    colorado springs, colorado
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Beal
    Fatal: Bios device code 0x81 is being used by two disks
    /dev/hdg (0x2200) and /dev/hde (0x2100)
    root@knoppix-klb:~#
    From man lilo.conf:

    disk=<device-name>
    Defines non-standard parameters for the specified disk. See sec-
    tion "Disk geometry" of user.tex for details. Especially useful
    is the `bios=' parameter. The BIOS numbers your disks 0x80, 0x81,
    etc. and it is impossible to decide which Linux disk corresponds
    to which BIOS disk (since this depends on the BIOS setup, and on
    the type of BIOS), so if you have an unusual setup you need to
    state the correspondence between Linux disks and BIOS disks. For
    example,

    disk=/dev/sda
    bios=0x80
    disk=/dev/hda
    bios=0x81

    would say that your SCSI disk is the first BIOS disk, and your
    (primary master) IDE disk is the second BIOS disk. Other options
    include the specification of disk geometry; e.g.,

    disk=/dev/fd0
    sectors=18
    heads=2
    cylinders=80
    With that in mind, try this:

    sudo /sbin/lilo -v3 -t

    That should tell you what you need to enter in LILO.

    Try something like this for example:

    disk=/dev/hde
    bios=0x80

    disk=/dev/hdg
    bios=0x81

Similar Threads

  1. where has LILO gone
    By whoeverheis in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-25-2005, 07:13 PM
  2. Reinstall lilo to hda, using hda lilo.conf and knoppix live
    By tomjermy in forum Hardware & Booting
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2005, 01:07 AM
  3. LILO
    By emartinson in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-21-2004, 04:22 AM
  4. Fix LILO?
    By JockVSJock in forum General Support
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-09-2004, 10:42 AM
  5. lilo help
    By sminotti in forum Hdd Install / Debian / Apt
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-04-2003, 03:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


🔀 Juniper Networks EX2300-C-12P 12× Gigabit PoE+ • 2× 10G SFP+ Compact Switch ⚡ picture

🔀 Juniper Networks EX2300-C-12P 12× Gigabit PoE+ • 2× 10G SFP+ Compact Switch ⚡

$109.99



Juniper EX2300 12-Port Gigabit PoE+ Managed Network Switch P/N: EX2300-C-12P picture

Juniper EX2300 12-Port Gigabit PoE+ Managed Network Switch P/N: EX2300-C-12P

$149.99



Juniper Networks EX2300-48P 48-Port PoE Gigabit Switch (Renewed) picture

Juniper Networks EX2300-48P 48-Port PoE Gigabit Switch (Renewed)

$344.74



Juniper QFX5100-48S-3AFI 48-Port SFP+ 6 QSFP+ 2x SFP/RJ-45 Management picture

Juniper QFX5100-48S-3AFI 48-Port SFP+ 6 QSFP+ 2x SFP/RJ-45 Management

$249.97



Juniper MX204 +JUNOS and Dual Power Supply picture

Juniper MX204 +JUNOS and Dual Power Supply

$7299.99



Juniper QFX5120-32C-AFI  32x100GbE Switch Dual AC Airflow In, Rail Kit Included picture

Juniper QFX5120-32C-AFI 32x100GbE Switch Dual AC Airflow In, Rail Kit Included

$8150.00



Juniper EX2300-C 12 Port Compact Gigabit Switch EX2300-C-12p Discounted Cosmetic picture

Juniper EX2300-C 12 Port Compact Gigabit Switch EX2300-C-12p Discounted Cosmetic

$79.86



Juniper EX2300-C-12P 12 Port Gigabit PoE+ 2x10G SFP+ Managed Compact  Switch picture

Juniper EX2300-C-12P 12 Port Gigabit PoE+ 2x10G SFP+ Managed Compact Switch

$179.99



Juniper EX3400-24P 24-Port PoE+ GbE + 4-Port 1/10Gb SFP Switch picture

Juniper EX3400-24P 24-Port PoE+ GbE + 4-Port 1/10Gb SFP Switch

$245.00



Juniper EX4300-24P 24 Port Gigabit PoE+ Switch. picture

Juniper EX4300-24P 24 Port Gigabit PoE+ Switch.

$95.62